| |
Page 17
1. 2. 3. 4.
5. 6. 7.
8. 9. 10.
11. 12. 13.
14. 15. 16.
17. 18. 19.
20. 21
22 23
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
23 Aug 2002
Ali,
I've
learned a lot from reading your website "FaithFreedom." It is a great resource for useful information on Islam, and an
extremely relevant resource given current events. I applaud your bravery in creating a website that promotes a
controversial viewpoint in such an informed and rational manner.
I
think it is important for people to be able to reasonably question and
critique religions without worrying about offending zealots. Catholicism, for instance, is facing internal and external
review in light of current scandals. Why not critically examine Islam in the same way?
Your
position as a former Muslim offers you unique credibility. It would be very difficult for a Christian or a Jew to offer the
sort of criticism of Islam that you have without being dismissed as
racist. This is probably why
we don't see more candid critiquing of Islam in the mass media. Who,
besides a Muslim, could offer such criticism without being
"insensitive", losing their job, or forfeiting their career?
You are in a unique position to question Islam without being dubbed
a racist.
While
Bush tells us that "Islam means Peace," and NPR insists that
Fundamentalist Islam is somehow not "the true Islam," you have
the courage to point out what should be clear for everyone to see: that
Islam has fanaticism at its roots, as exemplified by the life of Muhammad.
This
is just some fan mail to applaud you for a great website. It must be a difficult task and I'm sure you have received your
share of hate mail, etc. So I
just wanted to say great job and keep up the great work.
Jon
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
REVIEW
& OUTLOOK
From
Wall Street Journal
Wednesday,
August 21, 2002
|
Limousine
Terrorists
We've
all heard the pop sociology: Terrorists are poor and desperate,
driven to acts of violence by poverty and a lack of opportunity.
Well, no.
Mohamed
Atta was of course a middle-class Egyptian. And now comes a new
study from the National Bureau of Economic Research that finds no
link between poverty and terrorism. Economists Alan Krueger and
Jitka Maleckova discovered that precisely the opposite is true: The
Lebanese, Palestinian and Israeli terrorists they studied are
wealthier and better educated than the general population from which
they came.
The
study compares 129 Hezbollah "martyrs" who died between
1982 and 1994 with the greater Lebanese population in the same age
range. The researchers found that "having a standard of living
above the poverty line or a secondary-school education or higher is
positively associated with participation in Hezbollah."
They
find similar patterns for Palestinian suicide bombers and Israeli
settlers who attacked Palestinians in the West Bank in the early
1980s (though they have less data). The authors also analyze GDP
fluctuations and find no evidence that terrorism is more common in
periods of economic hardship.
The
study concludes: "There is little reason to be optimistic that
a reduction in poverty or increase in educational attainment will
lead to a meaningful reduction in the amount of international
terrorism, without other changes." This won't surprise people
of common sense, but it never hurts to have some evidence the next
time the "root causes" crowd comes looking for more money.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
Aug 19 2002
Dear
Fellow Human Being,
I am grateful for your knowledge, courage, and love of truth that
you exist on. I have a Great Love and Respect for You. Thank you. Thank
you. I am relieved by your wisdom and love for truth.
My mind and soul seem to be a replica of yours. You have truly made
my day.
Your website is absolutely perfect. May God Bless You and Bless You
and Bless You.
I am in the New Age philosophies. I do see that Islam will go to
extinction and I do see that only religions and philosophies with
spiritual messages will flourish. There is no other way. "Growth is
the only game in town. There is no other road to take".
I will definitely be sharing your website. You have made an effect
on planet earth for the better. Your existence has been well worth it.
When you get to heaven, I hope you would say a nice word for me.
About 3 years ago, Al-Aqeada had a website explaining how to kill
non-believers. "You very slowly choke them, and as you do, you ask
them if they want to become muslims; release only if you hear an
affirmative".
Islam is when insanity was in flower. I feel sorry for the good
constructive thinking muslims, they are suffering greatly, too.
May God be with us all in this adventure on planet earth.
Sincerely,
Joe
F
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
Aug 17 2002
Last night on C-Span-2, there was a broadcast of
a conference held this past Wednesday by the Center for Immigration
Studies www.cis.org
The were four speakers featured, with the main one being Daniel Pipes.
I looked for mention of this event at your site and didn't see
any. I think this was an extraordinary event in one sense, in
that this was the first time I've ever heard legal immigration talked
about in negative terms in a public forum, and more specifically, as it
relates to the immigration of Muslims. All of the
speakers were in support of this view, with Mr. Pipes being the strongest
advocate. The essential point made was that Muslim immigrants to
America have yet to prove their loyalty and support for America and
democratic freedoms, while it has already been clearly shown that a number
either support terrorist activities and/or Islamic extremism.
Mr Pipes cited the three main Muslim-American organizations as all being
tied to Saudi interests, if not terrorism, themselves. He then cited
another organization, the Council of American Muslims(?) as being moderate
organization and a good model for American Muslims. He then chided
journalists for using as sources the corrupt mainstream American-Muslim
organizations while ignoring the more moderate, less mainstream
organizations and Muslim leaders. Mr. Pipes laid out four
points in his speech. I don't know if I am repeating them fully.
One point he made that I thought really needs to get out there is how
these particular Muslim-American organizations are misrepresenting Islam,
by constantly portraying it as a peaceful religion with peaceful,
integrationist intentions. Its important to point out that Mr.
Pipes is referring to Islamic extremists, in its most pervasive form,
Wahabbism. Mr. Pipes still does not maintain that Islam and the West
are headed for a clash of civilizations, as he still likes to argue that
Islam as it is originally intended is a peaceful religion. I
personally don't think he actually believes that. I think the only
reason he doesn't say otherwise is he knows he would lose his credibility,
if not his life, if he were to come out and say it. One
interesting thing I've noticed in reading through his website was seeing
his comment on the many email comments he posts at his websites, where a
vast majority argue this very point, that Islam is not a peaceful
religion. Mr. Pipes said this is an indication that the American
public is aware of what's going on. I thought that was telling.
I think there is a good chance this particular program will be repeated
some time this weekend. In case it isn't, you may be able to find a
transcript at Daniel Pipes web site, at www.danielpipes.org,
where he posts other transcripts. Daniel Pipes' new book
on militant Islam was just released this past week, so he is making the
rounds on a number of programs. I saw him earlier in the week face
off against a big fat character named Hussein Ibbish?, head of the
Anti-Arab Discrimination League. This guy is obnoxious, and never
seems to agree with anyone (he's the real extremist), and frequently uses
denial to counter. The interesting thing about this discussion
was there was also an English journalist in the discussion, who used the
example of the IRA as being a similar terrorist organization with evil
intent, one which happens to funded and supported by many Irish-Americans.
His point here was that America should not attack Iraq because Iraq
doesn't seem to have global ambitions toward terror, while there is now
real proof it has. He then added the specious argument that since
Americans supported the IRA, other countries could find justification in
attacking America for being a terrorist supporter. Strange as it may
sound, I've heard these arguments before. The IRA is not
engaged in a worldwide campaign, nor do they quote scripture as
justification for their acts, while they targets they do seek out have
more to do with political aims than religious hatred. Ireland
is perhaps the most Christian country on earth, with a 91% church
attendence rate.
One last point. I sometimes read comments at your web site about the
relation of religion and secularism in the advancement of democracy and
human rights posted by various menbers (I don't mean you). Just to
add my 2 cents. I don't believe Christianity is antithetical, more
specifically Jesus, to democracy. Though I realize there has
been for long periods an adversarial relationship between Christianity and
its governing bodies and democracy, I think these points of difference
have had more to do with Christians acting in their own self-interest
rather than based on Christ's teachings. Basically, Christians
got it wrong, as they had for a number of things, and as some bodies still
do (another can of worms. I try not to confuse Christ with Christians or
religion). Historian Thomas Cahill makes this point in the last
chapter of his book "Desire of the Everlasting Hills", where
though he acknowledges the enormous debt we all have to secular thinkers,
he still maintains this importantance of Judeo-Christian values in
advancing civilization, and in the revolutionariness of Christ's
teachings, specifically in the Sermon on the Mount. Here he argues,
along with historian Donald Kagen, a Jewish author, that there arose from
Christ a more englightened understanding of the virtue of peace.
If I have point in all this in relation to Islam, it is that though I can
see democracy coming out of or evolving, even flourishing while living
alongside Christianity, I can't see it as such from Islam and its values.
That in itself may be the most profound argument against Islam.
The link below is an article that touches on some of the history of the
point I've made. This article may even have been written by a
non-Christian. I can cite other sources, like American historian
Michael Novak, and so on, but I think I'll just stop
at
this.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
Hello,
I thoroughly enjoy your site.
I have been to the Middle East three times for 4-month (Saudi
Arabia), 3-month (Dubai), 6-month (Israel) stints.
I learned quite a lot about Muslims.
Here is a poem that I wrote mostly one morning when I woke up and
could not write fast enough.
Hatred
Justified
Deep is the wound,
How it hurts them so.
They could be God’s people,
If the Jews would just go.
How close they were,
How far away.
They were Abraham’s seed,
Not chosen by Yahweh.
Son of Sarah,
God’s blessing was given,
Son of
Haagar,
From Abraham was driven,
The pain was great,
They could not bear.
Their God would not do that,
He must be more fair.
This story was thus,
The book said so.
The story must change,
The text must go.
The hate was deep,
For the people of the book.
The serpent saw his chance,
And the chance he took.
To a business man,
And a warrior too.
One who was confounded,
By Christian and Jew.
As an angel appeared,
Not God to heed.
Not a single new quote,
From God to read.
If the God of the Book,
Had treated them so.
They would have new text,
For the people to know.
It had to supplant,
The Old and the New.
Replace the Christian,
And especially the Jew.
The text seemed sweet,
The text seemed smooth.
The changes were made,
To make a move.
A large mass of people,
Would be so stirred.
The Book you see,
Has been quite blurred.
Presented as God’s Word,
But twisted and perverted.
But from Ishmael’s lineage,
No objection was blurted.
The new text would show them,
As those who God favored.
As God’s chosen people,
Which is something they
savored.
It fit their interest,
It fit their need.
They must defeat,
Abraham’s blessed seed.
The infidelity to God’s
word,
Could hardly be worse.
But any good lie,
Contains some truth of course.
Some of God’s Word borrowed
From Christian and Jew.
But made crooked with lies,
And personal agendas too.
Their jealousy strong,
Their blessing denied.
Now their hatred,
Seemed justified.
The people united,
Behind the angel’s new word.
Cries of jihad, and war,
And killing were heard.
Their aim is quite clear,
Their course in view.
The Jews must go,
And all their friends too.
The angel and his prophet,
Have symbiotic need.
Based on envy and hatred,
False pride and greed.
The lie was deep,
From Satan it came.
To fight God’s Kingdom,
For him not just a game.
The angel’s agenda,
Displace God as Creator.
No goal of Satan,
Could be any greater.
Organize a following,
By changing God’s word.
Make it sound sweet,
So no objection is heard.
Supersede the Bible,
God’s word not the same,
A new god to pray to,
Allah is his name.
Replace God’s word
With more favorable text.
To replace God Himself,
Was hoped to be next.
The God of the Christian,
The God of the Jew.
Is not the same god,
These people pray to.
It greatly depends,
On one’s reference believed.
To call Satan’s plan good,
Is to call God’s bad you
see.
With fidelity to Satan,
Islam prays five times a day.
As an infidel to them,
To God the Creator we pray.
Arrogance of Satan,
Is nothing anew.
To bet against God,
Not a smart thing to do.
Satan’s plan to usurp
God’s place,
Is nothing new in the world.
But, under Islam,
It’s legitimized, taught and
nurtured.
These are people God also
created,
They can also receive God’s
Love.
But, they support His enemy,
And don’t seek Him from
Above.
As Islam seeks to spread,
By force and deception.
Those who believe in God,
Must give it no kind
reception.
Muslims are people too,
Who are misdirected.
From their wayward path,
They must be redirected.
Their path is untrue,
A way much diverted.
They must be shown,
God’s word
unperverted.
God of Testament Old,
And of Testament New,
Is God to the Christian,
And God to the Jew.
The Bible remains strong,
A message well heard.
God’s people will win,
God keeps His word.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
August 18, 2002
Dear Ali Sina;
I am an ex-muslim as of 20 years ago. I have been in the US 25 years
now and I find that your website is the only place where we can find the
truth about Islam from a historical, religious and political
perspective.
I congratulate you for your brave stand to teach others the truth
about the real Islam and make an attempt to shed some light for the 90%
of Islam's followers who are totally ignorant about the truth with
respect to Islam. This is truly a good service you are doing for mankind
and I hope you keep up the good work to educate everyone about Islam.
It is important to unmask Islam's religious leaders who continue to
thrive on the ignorance of the masses and present these poor followers
with a mirage of Islam and not the truth about the hate and violence
which keeps these dishonest religious leaders in control both
spiritually and politically.
Please continue the good work!
Kaveh Ahangar
Houston, Texas
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
D.M.
I went to your page and found the link to the anti-Sina site.
Interesting to say the least, especially the two pictures, the one
of the woman being beaten and the partially clad woman.
I may be very mistaken about this, but are many men from Islamic countries obsessed with sex?
I have asked people through chat if a woman in an Islamic country
can drive alone at any hour of the night
like I do and not fear violent crime.
I live in a larger
city. I've also lived in small towns where women will walk alone
after dark without fear of molestation.
I've never had this question answered.
Dear D.M.
Not just Muslim men but Muhammad himself was
obsessed with sex. It is reported that he refused to shake the hands of
women who wanted to pay allegiance to him and his cause. Now this is
either because he considered them dirty or because he was having sexually
feelings about them and therefore wanted to avoid temptation. Muslim men
think like him. The reason they beat the women if they expose a hair or a
body part is as you said, due to their obsession with sex. They are unable
to see women as fellow human beings. To them women are sexual objects and
since this would cause temptation they force women to cover themselves.
Of course Islamic veil has other causes.
Muhammad was an old man with a bunch of beautiful teenagers as his wives.
He felt very insecure when young men laid their gaze at his wives.
Therefore in one occasion when some men were visiting him and his wives
were roaming around in the house, he made his ready-to-comply Allah to
"reveal" some verses that ordered his wives to cover themselves.
Now Muslims use those verses to impose Islamic hi jab on millions of
women.
Regards
Ali Sina
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
3 Aug 2002
Ali,
I think you are doing a
wonderul thing with your site and hope it gets alot of exposure. It's set
up with the truth and of course that is what sets people free.
What do you think should happen
in order for this faith (rather misguidance)
to become one of pacifism and tolerance? Am looking for answers and can
any be found in the Qur'an and in any leaders or sects?
I continue to look at
your site and go to the different links to learn more. Thanks for
providing it!
Out of curiousity, what
is your religion?
Thnaks for the good work,
jeff
Thank
you,
I
hope that this site get a lot of exposure too and for that I rely on you
to promote it. I also hope to translate it in other languages. For that I
either have to raise funds or win a lottery. :)
Islam
cannot and will not become a pacifist and tolerant religion. Violence is
the message of Islam. Your question is like asking how can we make chicken
soup without chicken.
I
have no religion. I am cured from it.
Best
Ali
Sina .
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| |
|