Yamin Zakaria vs. Ali Sina
Part III Page 16
Back < >
Next
| Mr
Sina also claims Islam exhibits hate. But instead of just
elaborating his claims and providing his definitions of hate, it is
he that displays the hatred towards Islam and Muslims violating his
“Golden Rule”. From the tone, content and deliberate uses of
certain pejorative terms he incites hatred. Mr Sina’s website
confirms that as it only contains anti-Islamic diatribe but nothing
on his so-called “Golden Rule”. Why not? Because he wears a mask
and calls others ugly and he is afraid to show his face as it can be
also put on the dock.
Here
it is pertinent for me to quote an Old Persian says “If you
don’t like what you see in the mirror break your face not the
mirror”. Mr Sina must feeling the cracks in his face now and in
his words “lost”, “completely disarmed” and “the circuits
in his brain are short-circuited”. This only proves that
“freethinkers” are unable to pose intellectual argument and
provide an alternative that is as comprehensive as Islam, hence all
they do behind their masks is it try and provoke a fight ‘below
the belt’ by constantly emitting profanity and obscenity like
hoodlums! |
I don’t think hate needs to be defined. If you
disparage people calling them najis (unclean), children of apes and swine,
enemies of God, fuels for hell, etc. you are inciting hate. If you
encourage your followers to kill these people, be harsh with them, slay
them wherever they find them and smite their necks, this is inciting
violence.
Denouncing Islam is not violation of the Golden
Rule, just as denouncing Nazism or fascism is not the violation of the
Golden Rule. Actually denouncing any ideology even the good ones is not
against the Golden Rule. If an ideology can’t stand scrutiny it is false
and it must be denounced. But you can’t denounce the Golden Rule because
the Golden Rule is the principle and not a belief.
What is contrary to the Golden Rule is doing to
others what you don’t want to be done to you. For example fighting and
killing those who do not share your belief is against the Golden Rule. You
certainly don’t like it if someone forces you to submit to his belief
and kill you if you resist. So as you admitted Islam is contrary to the
Golden Rule and anything contrary to the Golden Rule is evil.
I don’t wear a mask. I told you I am a
humanist and a practitioner of the Golden Rule. In your tradition of
attacking your opponent’s beliefs, instead of defending Islam, you took
your cheap shot even at the Golden Rule and with that you dug your own
thumb. It is okay to attack any ideology, but you should not attack the
Golden Rule because the Golden Rule is not an ideology. It is the
principle that defines our humanity. This was your biggest mistake that
sealed your fate right from the start.
Sudden attack
| Another
example of the muddled mindset of Mr Sina is that he cannot
distinguish between the status of War, declared between nations and
actual military operation. He cites one of the raids of Prophet
Muhammad as wanton aggression but the war was declared prior to
that. Just like the
US
declared the war on
Iraq
but it did not give the Iraqis the battle plan telling them when and
how they will conduct the raids. |
You are talking about too many things at the
same time. When we get to this point I will prove that with the exception
of a few wars, almost all the raids of Muhammad were unannounced. In fact
the very word Qazwah, by which the wars of Muhammad have come to be known
means sudden attack. So let us not get too much distracted. I told you if
I do not prove any of my charges, I will withdraw that charge and
apologize for it. Just be patient, we will get to that.
| I
have decided to provide some entertainment by giving further
examples illustrating that he is false and muddled Prophet of the
cult of “Golden Rule”. You will have some light entertainment,
so please continue. I know it has been long. |
Dear Mr. Zakaria. You are here to respond to my
charges against Muhammad and prove me wrong. You are not here in the
quality of a comedian. How about leaving the entertainment after your
victory and for now you try to rebut my accusations?
A few weeks ago I had a long debate with Mr.
Edip Yuksel, one of the leaders of the Submitters. After the third round
of our debate he stopped discussing Islam altogether and instead he wrote
extensively about me, making a thorough and free of charge psychoanalysis
of me, quoted what others had written about me and finally made a
prediction that on February 19 something is going to happen to me which
neither the FBI nor my bodyguards can protect me. What could this thing
be, I wonder! My hunch is that he is poking needles in a doll that he calls Ali Sina.
May I suggest you leave the entertainment for
later and concentrate on your role as the defender of Muhammad? That is
why you are here after all, aren’t you? You are of course welcome to
entertain us as much as you like, but that won’t help you win the
debate.
On
Islam and Religion
– Here are a couple of quotes from Mr Sina:
a) “So far Islam has advanced by
camouflaging itself as a religion.”
b) “The reason I am against Islam is not
because it is a religion but because it is a political movement of
imperialism and domination in the guise of religion.”
He says Islam is not a religion in the first
quote then he says it is in the second quote, and again in the
latter part of the second sentence he says Islam is not a religion.
Exactly what Mr Sina is trying to tell us I will let the audiences
judge that and he does not posses a “logical gun” but an
“illogical and irrational gun”! |
I don’t see any
contradiction? I do not see Islam as a religion, even though sometimes I
use that terminology.
On
Nazism and Fascism
- Mr Sina says: “Do the Nazis have the right to have their party
and promote their cause? I don’t know of any democratic country
that allows such thing. Most democratic systems ban racist and
fascist movements.”
Well, almost all leading democracies,
including US and
Europe
permits Nazi parties and the likes to operate e.g. the “US Nazi
Party” started by Lincoln Rockwell, the “British National
Party” of Nick Griffin, and Vlaamsblok in Belgium etc. This is
common knowledge. As for Nazis who will decide who is a Nazi or not.
It is Mr Sina who is trying to HYPOCRITICALLY dictate to those whom
he considers to be Nazis and Fascists like a Nazi. Nazism and
Fascism were born amongst democracies not ISLAM. Its birth place and
practice was in
Europe
. Both pertain to the exaltation of their races as their central
theme which is diametrically opposed to ISLAM! Why Mr Sina uses such
words to charge other when he does not even have the basic
rudimentary knowledge on the subject! |
I am under the impression that
racist parties are disallowed in most democratic countries. But racist
groups form their own groupies and operate under the protection of the
freedom of speech act at the fringe of the law. It is the same law that
allows hatemongers like you live freely in the West and spew their venom
at their hosts. Anyway that is not the area of my expertise and I could be
wrong. I could be wrong on many things Mr. Zakaria. You are here to
disprove my charges against Muhammad and not the fact that I am not
infallible.
Islam is not against fascism.
As I said earlier, the verse (48:29)
that says "those
who are with him [Muhammad] are strong against Unbelievers, (but)
compassionate amongst each other”
is a perfect description of fascism. Islam
does not have the concept of race supremacy, even though Muhammad spoke of
the blacks disparagingly calling them “raisin heads” and joked about
the dark skin of the Bani Tamim saying they are Indians. Instead he
advocated religious supremacy. So in the religious sense, Islam is
“racist”. In Nazism the non Arians were considered inferior and the
Jews were the escape goats for all the social ills. In Islam the
non-believers are inferior and the Jews are the escape goats for every
thing that is wrong in Islamic world. In Nazism the Fuhrer was the
ultimate authority and no one could question him. In Islam Muhammad is the
ultimate authority and no one can question him. Craig
Winn, in The Prophet of Doom, has drawn the comparisons between Muhammad
and Hitler and the Quran and Mein Kampf. The similarities are astounding.
Back < >
Next
Back to Index
|
