Yamin Zakaria vs. Ali Sina
Part III Page 14
Back < >
Next
There are many who subscribe to the
Darwin
’s principle of: “the survival of the fittest”. If nature is
supposed to function in this way, why should this not be extended to human
beings? In fact, the free-market model found in most democracies operates
on this principle. Accordingly, some would argue as others have practiced
in the past, the right of the stronger party to extinguish the weak and
the disabled purifying the gene pool. Hence they apply their
interpretation of the “Golden Rule” and go on to take out the weaker
species or until they themselves get taken out by stronger party.
|
The survival of the
fittest is a law that applies even to humans. But we humans are not competing
against each other. In fact our survival depends on the understanding of
our oneness as one species. We can only survive through cooperation.
There
is a misunderstanding of the concept of the "survival of the
fittest" especially among the religious people. Let me clarify
that.
Survival
of the fittest does not mean the one who is most aggressive and violent
will survive. It means those who can
cooperate will survive. Let me explain the phenomenon of human evolution
to dissipate some of the myths surrounding it.
Some
millions
of years ago a group of apes used to live somewhere in
Africa
happily. A draught or some natural phenomenon like that forced them to
move out in the search of new pastures. One group went to the left and
they found a jungle full of fruit trees and few predators. They mostly
survived, procreated
and prospered and they lived there ever after. Their descendants
continue to live there up to this day.
The
other group went to the right and they found a prairie where fruit trees
were scares. They had to
eat grain to survive. Those of them who could use their fingers dexterously
found enough food. The rest starved and died. The prairies where filled
with ferocious beasts. Those of them who could stand on their two hind
legs and see the danger from afar had a better chance to escape and
survive; the rest fell prey to the wild animals and perished. Those of them who could cooperate had a better
chance to capture an antelope or other beasts of prey, but the rest died
out of hunger. Those of them who had bigger brains, were smarter and could make tools,
could kill bigger animals to eat. They survived; the rest did not. Many of them died, only a few who
had the above characteristics survived. These traits were
prized by nature and those who did not have them died at
childhood and did not pass their genes. Of course mutation is another
factor in evolution but this is not a course in biology.
Today
our survival depends on the same principles that helped us evolve and
become homosapiens. Those of us who can
cooperate, can watch each other’s nacks, can care for one another, and those of us who can make better
tools will survive. The rest will perish. Guess
who has these traits today? Muslims or non-Muslims?
Survival
of the fittest does not mean let us see who can pull the trigger first and
kill the other one faster. This is insanity. Our survival depends on how
we can cooperate with each other and take care of one another. It also
depends on our discovery of science and technology. Muslims are unable to
cooperate with anyone including themselves. Like their prophet they are
paranoid. They see enemies everywhere, enemies who dictate their destinies
either through remote control or by their proxies. They are also caught in
superstitions, fairytales and mindless rituals that renders them unable to
create science and technology.
Cooperation
and taking care of each other comes natural to us humans. We
instinctievely tend to care for each other.
If one is in danger, complete strangers risk their lives to save him
almost instinctively and very much irrationally.
We are deeply moved and pained when we watch the news about disasters hitting
people half a world away from us. This empathy is not common among other
animals. We are the only species that feel in our soul the pain of our
fellow beings. Of course not all humans have reached this humanness. Those
who dance in the street after hearing thousands of their fellow humans are
burned in tall buildings are not humans. They are beasts in human
shell.
Today over a billion people are following a psychopath. They have lost
their humanity. They can’t see the oneness of mankind. They constantly
fill their hearts and souls with hatred of their fellow beings. If you do not bow to their sadistic deity they regard you as
their enemy and think of nothing else but to kill or subdue you. The
psychosis of one man is now reflected in one billion zombies who genuinely
are unable of rational thought. A billion people following a psychopath
make a billion psychopaths. These billion plus disciples of madness are
bringing the world to the brink of destruction.
With
the technology that we have, strife is lethal to the survival our species. We have past
the stage when we had to compete with other animals. Now we dominate this
planet and as such we are its custodians. We are responsible to preserve
it for ourselves and for animals, our fellow passengers of this spaceship
called Earth. This is not against the
evolution. This is part of the evolution. Evolution is a continuous
process. Now we are at a stage where we are evolving, intellectually and
spiritually. We will be fit for survival if we use our intelligence, put
aside the stupid ideologies of hate and learn to cooperate with each
other.
Competition is not the
only law of evolution. Cooperation is a great factor in evolution. The
bees depend on flowers and the flowers depend on bees. We are all
interdependent and live symbiotically. The evolution is a
harmonic symphony. Our species
did not evolve through competition among ourselves. We evolved because we
learned to cooperate. The survival
of our species depends on our understanding of the fact that we are one
people, the proverbial children of Adam and Eve and dependant on one another.
Today nothing is
threatening our species more than strife. Ideologies that divide mankind
are dangerous. We have survived very dangerous ideologies such as fascism,
Nazism and communism. Now we are facing an even bigger threat and that is
Islam. Mankind must unite and
fight this ideology with all its might. If we fail to destroy Islam, our
extinction is guaranteed.
We
should fight the ideologies that divide mankind in “us” vs.
“them”. Islam is a divisive ideology. It is an ideology of hate. This ideology is insane. It is
created by a psychopath to manipulate, to divide and to conquer. We simply can’t afford
let Islam destroy mankind.
We invite the Muslims to stop this madness and join the rest of mankind. But
if they don’t, if all they think is to kill us and to dominate us, then
it is incumbent that we fight back and stop them. If they do not want to
listen, if they are so much inebriated in their insanity that will not
stop until they kill us all. Then we have no option but to kill them
first. We have to fight this insanity not only for our own survival but
also for the survival of our species and our civilization. Islam must be stopped at any cost. The longer we wait the
higher will be the price that we would have to pay.
The world is waking up
and is sensing the danger. They are hearing what you say and they are
taking you seriously. You have made your point that you would not stop until
you annihilate the rest of mankind. Your insane prophet promised you that
20 of you can kill 200 of us and at the end you will be victorious.(8:65)
As soon as the world see the futility of arguing with
you, they will
cast terror into your hearts (8:12), slay you (9:5)
and smite your necks; at length when they meet you (47:4).
We can't back off. Our back is against the wall. You must back off or face
our wrath.
After all when it comes to survival, we are all
animals. Your madness knows no bound and all you can
think of is how to destroy us and make your sadistic cult dominant. You’ll not be able to carry
out your evil design. We will destroy you first. Mankind is us. You
are followers of a psychopath. Mankind's weakness is in assuming that Muslims
have the same conscience that humans have. But by deriding at the Golden Rule
you made it clear that this is not so. You question the Golden Rule and
mock logic. My words have no effect on you and other Muslims who read this
site. Instead of coming to their senses and reasoning they feel offended, stop
reading or become hardened in their hatred. The only language you speak
and understand is the language of force and terror. The world is waking up
rapidly. I am your best and last hope. If you don't heed to me, if I fail to wake
you up with my words, others will start speaking to you in the language
that you understand best and wake you up in a bad way.
Why I am doing all this? Why I do not go back to my
profession and don’t make money? Why I denounced the luxuries and the
comfort that once I had and everyone takes for granted to write and to
wake you up? It is because I see all this happening.
I see cities burning in hot scorching smoke, I see scared children running naked
with their skin falling apart. I see cadavers everywhere and no one to
collect them and burry them. I see all these things, not like Nostradamus
who prophesied and predicted things but like a meteorologist forecasting the weather. Big
clouds are building up and a huge tempest is gaining momentum.
The
Armageddon is upon us. The only way to stop it is to stop the insanity of
Islam. I am doing my share to educate the Muslims and let them see Islam
is not a religion, but the madness of a psychopath. Islam is not going to
take you to heaven in the next world but it will take all of us to hell in this world. I want to stop
this tempest and avoid this disaster by waking up the Muslims and bringing
them to their senses. If I fail, we all fail. Humanity will fail and millions
if not billions will die.
I am not addressing you Mr. Zakaria. You are a lost
soul filled with hatred and blind faith. You kept asking me to
"unmask" myself and tell you what is my belief. I knew why. It
was because you can't defend Islam. All you can do is to attack your opponent's
creed. But you goofed this time. You attacked the Golden Rule.
You attacked the foundation of our humanity and what makes us humans,
humans. How ridiculous of you Sir. I am talking to millions of good people who are born in this cult
and think they are Muslims. I ask them to leave Islam today and announce
their apostasy. Don't wait. Don't hesitate. There is an explosion
building up. The only way to stop it is to deflate Islam by convincing
huge numbers of Muslims that they must leave this cult. Only this will
dishearten the terrorists and will end their madness. As long as you
remain a Muslim they become hyped and will continue destroying this
world.
Let the world know you no more support this madness and
you are not part of this network of terror and insanity. It is your
adherence to Islam that encourages people like Mr. Zakaria and Osama Bin
Laden to continue fomenting hate and destroying lives. They get energized by masses of Muslims
such as you who read their hateful articles and either nod or remain
silent. Your silence is lethal. Don’t wash your hands for the crimes of
Bin Laden and your other terrorist brothers. You are guilty by complacence
and when the disaster strikes, you, me and our children will not be spared. We
will all burn in this hell that you are about to bring upon mankind through
your ignorance and stupidity. Stop this
insanity and leave Islam today. Only you can prevent this war. All you
have to do is to leave Islam and curse the mad man who created it.
Stop this damn like that Islam is against killing or it means peace. You
know you are lying. Do not choose the path of hypocrisy and denial.
Recognize that you were misled. Leave Islam and learn to become human
again. You can't be a moderate Muslim. There is no such thing as moderate
Muslim.
So, I have
made my case based on Mr Sina’s definitions and his principles with
clear examples proving that the “Golden Rule” is not universal, not
self-evident, inadequate and not absolute. But also Mr Sina himself is
muddled on the issue! It is flawed as a fundamental principle. At best it
is just a moral advice to individuals to exercise self-restraint.
Therefore, the allegations against the final Prophet (SAW) cannot be
levied as MR. Sina himself does not know the meaning of his own rule, its
scope and therefore it is from being in a position authority to judge
others.
|
You are very much mistaken Mr. Zakaria. I perfectly know the
meaning of the Golden Rule and I live by it. It is you who do not
understand it, question its legitimacy and deny its universality.
Yes the Golden Rule is a moral advice to individuals. What
else you expected? Isn't religion a moral advice? The Golden Rule is a
good advice. Islam is a bad advice. This is the difference. At the end it
is up to the individuals to follow these advices or not. But those
who follow the Golden Rule do good and those who follow Islam do
evil.
The charges against Muhammad stand in full vigor. Muhammad broke
the basic principles of the Golden Rule. Because of this he is
disqualified as a human being let alone a prophet of God. He was a monster. If not an incarnation of Satan, he was indeed a very
disturbed psychopath. He must be compared to Jim Jones, David Koresh or Hitler.
In the
absence of proof it also implies Mr Sina like other anti-Islamic zealots
has blind faith in the “Golden Rule”, “based on shaky grounds”.
Yes, for once I do agree with Mr Sina let us call a spade a spade. Mr Sina
is the muddled ‘Prophet’ of the so-called “Golden Rule” who cannot
even articulate the basic idea of his rule and later examples will provide
corroborative evidence of his muddled mindset.
Mr. Sina will probably feel very uncomfortable if
he has managed to follow up to this point with sincerity. Hence, let him
now prove his so-called “Golden Rule” by addressing the above points.
Otherwise he is also hypocritically breaking his own rule when he said
earlier that: “he must be able to prove that assumption or withdraw
it”.
|
The reliance on the Golden Rule does not require any
faith Mr. Zakaria. The Golden Rule is not a belief. It is a principle based on
commonsense. It does not require any prophet. It is a compass that all
sane people carry within. It is the most obvious principle. Do onto others as you would wish them do onto you. What
could be clearer than that?
Back < >
Next
Back to Index
|