|
Javed Ahmad Ghamidi and
Khalid Zaheer vs. Ali
Sina
Part XVI
|
From Dr. Khalid Zaheer:
February 26, 2007
Dear Mr Ali Sina
Mr Ghamidi neither believes that any non-Muslim is allowed to be killed
because of his faith nor is an apostate eligible for that punishment
according to the Islamic law. You seem to carry a pre-conceived
understanding about Islam in your mind and when you read my messages, you
read what is already imprinted in your mind about Islam. No new
information
seems to be finding a way into it.
The Qur’an has been consistent in saying from the very first day of its
revelation that the disbelievers shall be punished if they would refuse to
accept the truth from God as delivered to them by the messenger. In many
of
the Makkan surahs (the chapters that were revealed when the prophet
didn’t
have any political authority in Makkah) the Qur’an very clearly warned
the
disbelievers that their fate would be no different from that of their
predecessors who denied their respective messengers: like them, the
contemporary disbelievers of the present messenger shall be punished by
the
Almighty. After mentioning the punishment that were meted out to the
disbelieving nations of Noah, Hud, Saleh, Lot, and Moses, may God be
pleased
with all of them, the Qur’an, in one of its earliest revealed surahs,
poses
this question: “Are your disbelievers any better than their predecessors
or
do they have immunity in the scriptures (from being punished for their
misdeeds)?” (54: 43) It is therefore a very superficial understanding of
the
prophet Muhammad’s, God’s mercy be on him, mission that he changed his
ways
at different stages of his career to suit his political ambitions. His
message was remarkably consistent all throughout his twenty-three years’
long prophetic mission. No one could have imagined that a lone individual
preaching the message of God with such confidence that he was threatening
his politically and militarily strong disbelievers of dire consequences if
they were to persist with their attitude of denial could ever have seen
the
days when the promises he was spelling out through the book of God would
materialize with such amazing precision that his later detractors would be
forced to charge him with ingenious political conspiracy. Which religious
charlatan has ever been able do accomplish such a miracle to come about
that
would enable him to declare prophetically from the very first day of his
mission that the stronghold of his opposition would crumble like house of
cards if opposition to him would persist?
You have asked to show where exactly was the miracle found in the
Qur’an. My
response to it is that the entire text of the Qur’an is a miracle.
Let’s ask
people to read the Qur’an and form their own opinions. We don’t need
to
convince or dissuade people from doing so. They will make up their own
mind.
If they don’t find God speaking most eloquently His message for the
humans
in it, they are under no obligation to believe in it. However, without
objectively going through a text which claims to be from God and forming
opinion on the basis of a disgruntled ex-Muslim would not be an objective
truth-seeking exercise. My own experience is that an objective reading of
it
shows amazing results. However, there is one condition for that result to
be
achieved: a strong yearning to seek the truth. So let’s encourage people
to
read it directly. If people are sufficiently dissatisfied after reading
it,
your objective would be achieved.
We had mentioned it at the beginning of this debate that we understand
Islam’s message through the Qur’an and sunnah, the two undisputed
sources of
Islam’s message. The other sources have to be seen in the light of these
two. We do not take the responsibility of the details of all the
historical
incidents that have been reported by sources that are less than fully
reliable. Therefore, claiming that the prophet said such and such thing
because a certain book mentions that is not a good enough reason to show
that he really said so. This is another remarkable feature of the message
of
Islam. It doesn’t leave the believers to rely on hearsay. The
authenticity
of the Qur’an is undisputed as indeed is the sunnah (religious practices
like formal prayers etc.) The incidents reported about the history of
Muslims cannot be completely relied upon. Their record has to be
interpreted
in the light of Qur’an and sunnah to decide whether such reports are
acceptable or not.
The kind of criticism you are making against Islam is not surprising for
any
keen reader of the Qur’an. Indeed the Qur’an itself mentions several
criticisms of the opponents with such clarity and responds to them with
such
conviction that the reader grows in confidence in the authenticity of its
claim to divinity.
You have talked about Hitler and others as having unleashed their terror
in
the name of God and therefore they too belonged to the same category as
the
prophet of Islam. I would have loved to read Hitler’s work if he would
have
claimed to be from God and would have justified his acts on the basis of a
convincing book. As I have mentioned earlier, the Qur’an most clearly
presents the reasons why some people were declared eligible to be killed
during the messenger’s time. Equating the killings during the two
periods as
the same is a reflection of a very superficial understanding of the two
periods.
You have accused that there is inconsistency in facts about Jesus Christ
in
the Qur’an. What is the basis of your claim? Is it really certain
knowledge
that Christians never considered Mary as a part of divinity? The Qur’an
never claimed that Christians have included Mary as a part of their belief
in trinity. However, it claims something else: that Muhammad and his
mission
have been mentioned in the earlier texts. The present Bible, both the Old
and New Testament, bears witness to the fact that despite changes due to
translations and attempts at altering the text, the Qur’anic claim can
still
be clearly seen in it. There is a mention in it that Ishmael, the ancestor
of Muhammad, was the son sacrificed by Abraham; that Ishmael’s progeny
would
proliferate as a consequence of it; that Makkah was the place where
Abraham
took his son; that there would be a Moses-like prophet with attributes
resembling no one but Muhammad; that the one to come would be accompanied
by
a ten-thousand-strong army (the exact number of people who accompanied him
in the conquest of Makkah); that he would come after Jesus and Elijah
(John
the Baptist); and that he would only come after Jesus has left this world.
After all these mentions, Muhammad, Allah’s mercy be on him, emerged as
the
promised messenger of God with a claim that he has arrived in confirmation
of what has been mentioned in the earlier books.
Some one has asked me as to why Mr Javed Ahmed Ghamidi is wasting his time
in this debate. My response is that I have already clarified that he is
not
a part of it any more. Mr Ali however wants his name to be continued to be
displayed as a participant.
Khalid Zaheer
(Words: 1200)
|
From Ali Sina
2007/02/27
Dear Dr. Zaheer:
There is a difference between warning people of
divine chastisement and raiding them, killing them, looting their
belongings and enslaving their wives and children and raping them.
All monotheistic religions engage in the same scare mongering that
if you don’t believe in God, He will be offended and will punish you.
This threat is harmless, unless you choose to believe in it. If you decide
not to believe, it can’t hurt you.
What Jehovah Witnesses think will happen to you and I after we die
does not affect us and should not be of our concern. However, it would be a different story if they decide
to raid our homes, slit our throats and enslave our wives and children or
bomb us. Then
their belief is no longer funny. We must take serious action and stop them.
If I threaten to kill you unless you do what I want
and then do good on my threat, am I a prophet? According to your
reasoning, I must be because I threatened that I would kill you and that
threat was materialized with accuracy. What other proof you need to
believe in me? My prophecy came true with precision.
It is mind-boggling that intelligent people like you,
engage in such logical fallacies. What is so miraculous about issuing a
threat and then carrying it out? If the victims of Muhammad had perished
by natural calamities, without his intervention, after he had forewarned
them, then you had a point. That never happened even though at times Muhammad spent
thirty consecutive days cursing his enemies. Where is the miracle in
threatening people and then cowardly raiding them with no warning?
You say that all one has to do to see the miracles in
the Qur’an, is read it. I did that and what I found was violence,
absurdity and hate. You don't deny that but tell us that there is also miracle in that
book and so we must not dismiss the book just because it is a violent
book. That violence is from God. Where is that miracle? Please show it to us.
Some speculate that Nostradamus was prophetic. Admittedly there are
many passages in the book of Nostradamus that can be seen as
prophetic. Those who make such claim can back up their claim with concrete
evidence. They quote hundreds of his quartets that seem to have
materialized. Not everyone agrees with them but it is undeniable that
sometimes his prophecies can be seen as accurate. Can you show us any
passage in the Qur'an that even remotely predicts something that happened
that was not self-fulfilled by Muhammad himself and his followers?
When I say that the Qur’an is full of errors,
contradictions and nonsense, I am showing them to you. All I am asking is
that you show us one of the miracles of the Qur’an. You have not done so
and you are unable to do it. It’s because this perceived miracle that
you are talking about is subjective. It is your wishful thinking that
makes banal words seem prophetic and miraculous.
You say that your experience tells you that an
objective reading of the Qur’an shows amazing results. If your reading
is objective, you should be able to communicate it. That is the difference
between objective and subjective. If you can’t express something
verbally and logically, then it is not objective, but rather subjective.
You say that one must have strong yearning for the
truth in order to see the miracles in the Qur’an. In order to have
strong yearning for the truth, you must first doubt. As long as you are a
believer you only yearn to validate your belief. You
need to be detached to find the truth. It is your strong yearning to believe that makes you
see miracles in the Qur'an. A Persian song says I am so much in love with
you that whoever I see from afar, I think it is you. Muslims are like that. They are
so much enamored with Muhammad and Islam that they see miracles in the
most banal things. They see the name of Allah written in clouds, in a tomato, on
goats, etc. The Christians on the other hand see the images of Jesus and
Mary everywhere. These are all wishful thinking. The miracles of the Qur'an are
of this kind. They are wishful thinking of the believers.
There is a difference between yearning to find the
truth and yearning to believe. The first is objective. You empty your mind
from all preconceived ideas and prepare yourself to find things that may
be contrary to your belief. The other is trying desperately to validate
what you already believe.
You say that only the Qur’an and the sunnah are
reliable and what the historians of Islam have written may not be true. I
have been quoting from the Qur’an and sunnah all along. Some Muslims are
even embarrassed by hadith and dismiss it as hearsay. That is okay.
The Qur’an is enough to show Islam is false.
You say the Qur’an responds to its critics with such clarity and
conviction that the reader grows in confidence in the authenticity of its
claim to divinity. Will you please show us where we can find this clear
response? You have been making this claim since day one and I have been
asking you to show that clear proof. Where is the proof Dr. Zaheer?
I compared Muhammad to Hitler and Joseph Kony who
also claimed that they were doing God’s work. You wonder weathered
Hitler could justify his acts on the basis of a convincing book and
reaffirmed that “the Qur’an most clearly
presents the reasons why some people were declared eligible to be
killed.”
What are those reasons? I asked you this question
many times. All you could tell me was that Muhammad was a messenger of God
and as such whatever he did was justified and it is not up to us to
question him. You even said that if I have a problem with that, I must
first come to terms with the fact that Muhammad was a prophet of God and
once that is established there should be no question why he did what he
did. Your rationale is that Allah knows best and it is not up to us humans
to question His wisdom. So even though Muhammad and Hitler acted very much
alike, we should not compare the two because Hitler did not have divine license to kill whereas Muhammad did. This rationale defies logic. God’s
actions cannot be illogical, unjust and cruel. The very fact that Muhammad
acted like Hitler and Kony puts him in their category. A true messenger of
God should not act like a criminal sadist. However, I even accepted to
agree with this illogical argument and asked you to show us the evidence
that Muhammad was indeed a true messenger of God and not a false prophet.
I have been asking this in every response I have written to you. You
have not given evidence to this claim yet.
Admit it, the only
proof you have that Muhammad was a prophet of God is his own words. This is the
same proof all cult leaders and impostors can give you. That is not enough
for rational and thinking people.
You claimed that the truth of Islam is objective. You
said that there are undeniable and clear proofs that Islam is a true
religion. Where is that proof? Why do you beat around the bushes and
don’t give it to us? When I say Muhammad was a pedophile, a rapist, an
assassin, a highway robber, a torturer, a liar, a deceiver and a mass
murderer, I back up every claim with examples of his life. I challenge
anyone to refute my proofs and I have promised to remove my charges,
apologize publicly, and even pay to anyone who can prove me wrong. Your
claim that the Qur’an is a miracle is nothing but wishful thinking.
There is no miracle in that book of nonsense and asininity.
If you are so sure that the Qur’an is a miracle then
why you are so afraid of FFI? When you put light and darkness next to each
other, light always wins. If the Qur’an is light and FFI is darkness,
then why did you block FFI in Pakistan and why you don’t publish our
debate in your site? Your argument is stronger and more convincing. Isn't
it? You
are winning. Aren’t you? So why not let Muslims read it and become
strong in their faiths? Often, my respected scholar friend, actions speak
louder than words.
You say the Qur’an gives clear reasons why some
people were eligible to be killed, but when asked to give those reasons
you did not seem to have any. Doesn’t this mean that you are willing to
kill innocent people for no clear reason at all? If you were not a Muslim,
would you even entertain the though of killing other humans for no reason?
Certainly not! This murderous trait in you is not innate. It is all due to
your indoctrination. Sadly, you are not alone. All Muslims who know Islam
well, think like you. That is why I said, there is no such thing as
moderate Muslim. We have either ignorant Muslims, those who don't know Islam,
or
terrorist Muslims. Moderate Muslim is oxymoron. It's like "spherical cube."
It makes as much sense a moderate Nazi, gentle torturer, honest
thief and truthful liar do. You are either an ignorant Muslim or a
terrorist Muslim but you can't be a moderate Muslim because such a
creature does not exist. It is a myth like unicorn. I was an ignorant Muslim. When my knowledge
of Islam grew I left it. What about you?
How can we live together in this world dear Dr.
Zaheer, when you are saying in our face that those of us who do not share
your views do not deserve to live? Do you see now why I only oppose Islam
and do not care about any other religion that I consider equally false? No
one else but a Muslim would say things that you said. All other religions
are mixed bags of good and bad. Islam is the only religion that has
nothing good in it. All other religions are made by humans and humans are
fallible. Islam is the only doctrine that is made by Devil to deceive and destroy
mankind.
Will you tell us, if God wanted
to kill those who disbelieve in him, why he created them in the first
place and if he has to kill them why he does not kill them himself?
Why is he depending on Muslims to do this dirty works?
In my previous response I talked about Joseph Kony,
the Ugandan madman who claims to be the messiah and the Mahdi at once and
kidnaps children to convert them into killing machines. He forces these
children to kill people including their parents to prove their loyalty to
him. If they refuse, he orders other children to kill them. This
psychopath says that his followers should place obedience to him above
everything else and love him more than they love their own parents.
Incidentally these were the very instructions of Muhammad too. Now the
question that I would like you to answer is what Allah wants to achieve by
asking the Muslims to murder the unbelievers? If the point is to kill them
because they don’t deserve to live in this world as you say, he can
easily do it himself. So, why he delegates this dirty job to his
followers? What kind of believers he wants to rear?
Have you ever thought of it? Do you have an answer for it? Next
time, please concentrate on this question.
|
You have accused that there is inconsistency in facts about Jesus Christ
in the Qur’an. What is the basis of your claim? Is it really certain
knowledge that Christians never considered Mary as a part of divinity? |
Yes it is really certain that at no time, no
Christian denomination worshiped Mary, the mother of Jesus, as one figure
of the trinity. The three persons in trinity are the Father, the Son and
the Holy Spirit. Mary has never been part of this trio. Muhammad has goofed when
made that claim. If you don’t believe me, it is up to you to bring one
historic text showing there were a group of Christians who worshiped Mary.
This alone should be enough for one who really seeks the truth, to realize
that the Qur’an is false.
|
The Qur’an never claimed that Christians have included Mary as a part of
their belief in trinity. |
I thought you were questioning my claim that the
Christians did never include Mary in the trinity. Now you seem to be saying
something completely opposite to what you said in your previous sentence.
Now you deny that Muhammad ever included Mary in the Trinity. No, problem.
Here is the Qur’anic verse that shows Muhammad thought Christians
worship Mary:
Qur’an.5:116
And behold! Allah will say: "O Jesus the son of Mary! Didst thou say
unto men, worship me and my mother as gods in derogation of Allah'?"
He will say: "Glory to Thee! never could I say what I had no right
(to say). Had I said such a thing, thou wouldst indeed have known it. Thou
knowest what is in my heart, Thou I know not what is in Thine. For Thou
knowest in full all that is hidden.
Now, let us look at this verse closely. Allah is
saying that Allah [sic] will ask, "did you [Jesus] order people to worship
you and your mom?" And the poor Jesus starts denying and defending
himself against this calumny. Doesn’t Allah know already what Jesus said
and what he did not say? Why he asks this foolish question from Jesus when
he should be the first to deny this calumny and defend him? This verse makes no sense at all?
Let us say your son is accused of something that you know for surety that
it is not true, for example he is accused of stealing something in England
when you know your son has not been in England. Will you ask your son,
"did you do it?" That would be foolish. You know he did not do
it and you should be the first to come to his defense and witness on his
behalf.
Let me plagiarize the style of the Qur'an and compose
a sentence like the verse 5:116.
“Tomorrow Ali Sina will ask Dr. Zaheer: ‘Did you
say that you are Japanese?’ Dr. Zaheer will respond, ‘I never said
that.’”
If I know you never said that and I am already
saying that when asked you will respond in negative, then why would I ask
this stupid question from you?
Is this the book you call miracle? Can anyone write
anything stupider than this? This verse is ridiculous from every angle you
look at it.
|
However, it claims something else: that Muhammad and his mission have been
mentioned in the earlier texts. The present Bible, both the Old and New
Testament, bears witness to the fact that despite changes due to translations and attempts at altering the text, the Qur’anic claim can
still
be clearly seen in it. |
Well, here is your chance to show that to us.
You have made many claims about the Qur’an but have not given any proof
to back those claims. If you show us one verse in
the Bible that points to Muhammad in a clear and unambiguous way, in a way
that I can’t use the same verse to prove my divinity, I will forego all
the blunders and absurdities in the Qur’an and become a believer.
This is the second question that I would like
you to answer in the next round.
|
There is a mention in it that Ishmael, the ancestor of Muhammad, was the son sacrificed by Abraham; that Ishmael’s progeny would proliferate as a
consequence of it; that Makkah was the place where Abraham took his son; that there would be a Moses-like prophet with attributes resembling no one
but Muhammad; that the one to come would be accompanied by a ten-thousand-strong army (the exact number of people who accompanied
him
in the conquest of Makkah); that he would come after Jesus and Elijah (John the Baptist); and that he would only come after Jesus has left this
world. After all these mentions, Muhammad, Allah’s mercy be on him, emerged as the promised messenger of God with a claim that he has arrived
in confirmation of what has been mentioned in the earlier books. |
You are referring to the chapters 16 to 22 of
Genesis. Let us see what these chapters say.
In chapter 16 we read that since Sarah, the wife of
Abraham could not bear a child, she suggested that her husband sleep with
Hagar, her Egyptian maidservant, so she could bear him a child. When Hagar
became pregnant, she also became rude to her mistress Sarah. Sarah
complained to Abraham who told her to do with Hagar as she pleases. Hagar
then fled to the desert and bore her son Ismael near a spring, called Beer
Lahai Roi that was between Kadesh and Bered, beside the road to Shur (nothing
to do with Mecca). An
angel of God found her and inquired what had happened to her. When Hagar
told her story, the angel told her to go back to her mistress and be an
obedient maidservant to her and said that she would have numerous descendants.
The angel also told Hagar that her son will be a “wild
donkey of a man. His hand will be against everyone and everyone's hand
against him. And he will live in hostility toward all his brothers.”
(Gen 16:12)
Now, this is not flattering at all. Hagar, the mother
of the Arabs, is rude and ungrateful. She bites the hand that feeds her.
She can’t handle being treated with respect. She needs to be treated
like a servant so she can be respectful. Ismael is also referred to as a
wild jackass of a man who fights with everyone and is hostile to all
his brothers. Considering how Arabs behave, one is amazed to see that
sometimes the Bible, this book of fairytales and absurdities, can get is so right. I see nothing in these Biblical
verses for you and I to brag about. Is this what you wanted to show me in
the Bible?
In the chapter
17 of Genesis God appears to Abraham when
he is already 99 years old and promises that he will give him a son,
Isaac, and says: “I will establish my covenant as
an everlasting covenant between me and you and your descendants after you
for the generations to come.” (Gen.17:7) He also says that through Isaac Abraham will have many descendants and
that "The whole land of Canaan,.. I will
give as an everlasting possession to you and your descendants after
you".(Gen.17:8) Is he talking about Ismael? No! He is talking
about Isaac and his descendants. So if you believe in the god
of the Bible then you know why Arabs are losing in Palestine. It is
because they are in breach of the everlasting covenant of God. They are
fighting against the will of God. The Land of Canaan is promised to the
children of Isaac in an everlasting covenant.
Muhammad said that the covenant of God is null and
void because the Jews rejected him. Now we have evidence that Muhammad was a
liar impostor and the Jews were in their right mind to reject him. God
does not break his covenant even if humans do. That would not be godly.
The promise that God gave Abraham was not conditional. Allah is whimsical. He lies, deceives and
plots. According to the Qur'an he is khairul makereen
(the best of deceivers). However, the real God cannot be like that. Makr (deceit)
is not a divine quality. This Quranic verse is enough proof that Allah is
not God.
Then Abraham asks that God also bless his other son,
Ismael, and God agrees to increase his descendants too. Between you and I,
I think that was very shortsighted of God to do so. He knew that the descendants of
this wild donkey of a man will have their hands against the hands of
everyone else and will be hostile to all mankind. He should not have given
in to Abraham in order to please him and he should not have made the
descendants of Ismael populous. That was a big blunder. Now we
are facing a world crisis because there are too many wild donkeys who kick
hard and have even learned to make bombs.
Imagine how dangerous it would be if donkeys had horns. Muslims with bombs
are more dangerous than donkeys with horns.
When Isaac was born, Ismael, who was 14 years older,
started to abuse him. [His descendants are doing the same to the
descendants of Isaac, even though they are bigger. Nothing has changed.]
Sarah said to Abraham "Get rid of that slave
woman and her son, for that slave woman's son will never share in the
inheritance with my son Isaac." (Gen
21:10). [Well, even though the Arbas have 500 times more land than the
Jews, and their land has oil, the descendants of Ismael have no eyes to
see the children of Isaac and want to take that tiny land away from them
and drown them in the sea. Like father, like son.] So Abraham and Sarah
kicked Hagar and Ismael out of their house.
Abraham was saddened because
after all Ismael was his son. God told him, "Do
not be so distressed about the boy and your maidservant. Listen to
whatever Sarah tells you, because it is through Isaac that your
offspring will be reckoned." (Gen.21:12) Did you hear that? Please read it again.
However, God
added: “I will make the son of the maidservant
into a nation also, because he is your offspring."
The Qur’an says that it was Ismael that Abraham
wanted to sacrifice. This is wrong. According to the Bible, God said to
Abraham, "Take your son, your only son,
Isaac,
whom you love, and go to the region of Moriah. Sacrifice him there as a
burnt offering.” (Gen.
22:2)
Now, we know that Isaac was not the only son of
Abraham. However, God did not even count the other jackass of a man as the
son of Abraham. He was simply not important to be counted. Abraham
loved only Isaac. Yes, God
promised that Ismael will have a lot of descendants. He promised the same to
rabbits and pigs too. Having a lot of children is not the sign of importance. The
poorest and the most ignorant nations of the world are more procreative.
Where in the Bible it says that one of the descendants of this wild donkey
of a man will become a prophet and will lead mankind to God?
You have claimed a lot of things, but you are yet to
give evidence to those claims. You even went as far as saying that Islam
is not faith but fact. And yet, despite repeated requests, you have not
shown any fact. Now you say that there is mention of Muhammad in the
Bible. Will you show that to us? Which chapter? Which verse?
|
Some one has asked me as to why Mr Javed Ahmed Ghamidi is wasting his time
in this debate. My response is that I have already clarified that he is
not
a part of it any more. Mr Ali however wants his name to be continued to be
displayed as a participant. |
Dear Dr. Zaheer. I think we already knew from day one
that you are the one who are writing these articles and not Mr. Ghamidi.
You stated several times that you consult with him before writing your
responses. Has anything changed? Have you stopped consulting him and if
yes, why? Does Dr. Ghamidi think it is waste of his
time to to help you defend Islam in front of thousands of people? In the
course of a few
years this debate would be read by millions. Does he still think it is not
worth his time? There are thousands of people, particularly Muslim
youths who read FFI. Doesn’t he think that it is his duty to show them
that I am mistaken so their faith become stronger? There are also many
non-Muslims who read this site and they too are eager to see the
undeniable truth of Islam. You don't want them being misled by me. Do
you?
I know there are Muslims who write to the scholars
that I invite to debate telling them to stay away from debating with me. I wonder why?
I hope it it is not because they think this would cause embarrassment to
Islam. Why not
take advantage of this opportunity and show the truth of Islam to the
world?
You claimed the Qur'an has undeniable evidence
and irrefutable proof and that once that is established then everything
else becomes irrelevant. Although I do not agree with this logic and
believe that even a single error in the book claimed to be verbatim word
of God disqualify it as such, I stopped asking you questions about the Qur'an
so you could show us that proof and agreed to abide even by this
unreasonable premise. However you did not show us any proof that the Qur'an
is from God. So I go back to asking questions. Here are the two questions I would like you to focus
on the next time.
Question #5
If God must kill the unbelievers, why he does not do it
himself? Why he asks Muslims to soil their hands with blood and become
bloodthirsty murderers? What kind of people Allah wants to collect around
himself as his followers? Will the paradise be full of assassins,
murderers and terrorists? Why Allah has placed so much emphasis on
fighting and killing and rewards those who kill for him more than those
who don't?
Question # 6
Will you please show us one example where Muhammad is
referred to in the Bible? Muhammad said that the Bible mentions his name (Ahmad). I never saw him mentioned in the Bible.
If you like shorter responses, you may respond to
these two questions in two parts.
I remain cordially yours
Ali Sina
< Back
Next >
|
