Home

 Articles

 Op-ed

 Authors

 FAQ

 Leaving Islam
 Library
 Gallery
 Comments
 Debates
  Links
 Forum

 

 

 

Then you wrote: “The man we are talking about has been very brave and exceptionally successful as a military commander.”

This is much easier to refute. All you have to do is read his biography. Ibn Sa’d says “The prophet participated in 27 ghazwahs personally and he dispatched 47 sarirahs (in which he did not participate) [6] Even though he participated in 27 ghazwah he never fought person to person in anyone of them. He often wore two coats of mail, one on to of the other and surrounded himself with bodyguards. He would become so heavy that he needed two men to help him walk. In that state, he would stay behind his army encouraging his men to be valiant and defy death, promising them houries and celestial foods if they are killed.

Even during the War of Sacrilege, when he was 20 years old, Muhammad did not fight personally. In that war, he used to hide and during the cease fires, he used to collect the arrows and bring them to his uncles. In Uhud all his men had to fight because they were losing and because of that he was left without bodyguards. He hid himself in a crevice. Qamayyah from the army of the Quraish reached him and blow a sword at him. The sword broke his tooth but because he had a helmet, he was not hurt more. He cried of help and Talha bin Obaida and other Muslims arrived and Qamayyah retreated. This is the only time Muhammad put his own precious life at risk, not because he fought but because he allowed all his men to leave him alone and go to fight.

I challenge you to bring one instance where Muhammad has fought person to person. You can’t find such thing in Ibn Ishaq, Al Waqidi, Tabari and in Ibn Sa’d’s Tabaqat. Muhammad was not a courageous man. He was a coward. He never fought in his life. Find me one reliable source that says Muhammad fought personally and I will apologize. You won’t be able to do that. That much for the bravery of this fiend! He encouraged others to fight and die while he always stood in a safe place behind.  

As for being a great military man, I am afraid you are confusing a terrorist with a general. Muhammad's success is not because he was a great strategist but because he broke all the norms of ethics and chivalry and raided villages with no warning when men had gone after their daily business and were unarmed and unaware of his sinister attacks. Why do you think his wars are called ghazwah? Doesn't ghazwah mean raid, ambush, sudden attack? Today Muslim terrorists follow his footsteps and do as he did and still call their terrorist acts "ghazwah". For example the ghazwah of 9/11, the gfhazwah of Madrid, etc. Muhammad was the first Muslim terrorist.  

 

You are not alone professor in having such a superficial knowledge and understanding of Islam. I was just like you about a decade ago. Islam is not your field and I do not blame you for not knowing the facts. Also there is so little truthful literature available. So how can you know the truth when you are surrounded by lies?

However, being a man of learning and intellect, it is incumbent upon you to investigate further and do not rely on what the apologists of Islam tell you. Gradually more literature speaking the truth is coming out and the Internet has been a godsend to all truth seekers. Start with faithfreedom.org. Since you speak Persian, why stop here? There is a wealth of information for us Iranians available in Farsi. Order The 23 Years of Prophetic Career by Ali Dashti, read Ahmad Kasravi’s books, Mr. Ansari, Dr. Roshangar and many others have written great books. If you don’t have time to read books, make sure to watch the programs of Mr. Bahram Moshiri. This man is undoubtedly one of the greatest men of our country. I wish people who praise me, could see Mr. Moshiri. They will agree with me, why I feel so worthless of praise. This great man is awakening Iran. Iran has given birth to worthy men and women. When I think of them, I become proud of being an Iranian. Otherwise I cover my face in shame for what the Iranian rulers and the brainless Muslims do. 

You say “No man has been able to influence the history and destiny of mankind as much as he has.”

I agree. But has this influence been positive? Look at the countries that have been influenced most by him. Aren’t they the most wretched, the most barbaric and the poorest countries of the world, where human rights are violated, women are abused, lives are cheap, dictatorships thrive and freedom and democracy are inexistent? What has been the influence of Islam on science, commerce, art, literature, music and on poetry? The only thing Islam teaches is jihad, loot and rape. Muhammad's influence on mankind has been more devastating than the influence of cholera, AIDS, Nazism, communism or all other social or biological plagues. Islam has been the biggest curse on humanity and particularly on poor Muslims who are its primary victims.  

You wrote: “People who believe in him love him to the extent that give their lives to defend his legacy and won't be distracted by your and similar efforts. Therefore he is to be respected or at least not to be insulted.”  

That is exactly where the problem lies. We have a billion people brainwashed to the extent that they are willing to murder innocent people over the silliest things such as a few cartoons. This is insanity. Nothing to be proud of! This is ignorance, stupidity and the cause of shame.  

I don’t think such a monster has to be respected. It is foolish to respect a pervert criminal like Muhammad. This is like respecting Hitler because his followers adored him. Muhammad must be despised and derided. He must be mocked. His followers must be ridiculed. If they become violent they must be stopped with superior force. We must not give in to bullies. That would be a terrible mistake. As bullies Muslims want to gain respect through fear. We must be alert to their ploy and make them fear us. Because Muslims have entered in Muhammad's psychopathic bubble universe, they have become psychopaths by extension. Psychopaths know only one language and that is the language of fear. They speak that language and listen to it. The conscience of a psychopath is like the conscience of an animal. His laws are the laws of the jungle. Once the rest of the world wake up and start showing them who is the boss, Muslims will stop this savagery. They will stop barking and will start wagging their tails. These rabid dogs will become docile as puppies only if they fear you.   

I am very much in favor of ridicule and shame. This medicine works. It worked for me. I felt ashamed of Islam. It worked on  you too. Didn’t it? You are still a Muslim at heart, or why else would you defend it? Yet you deny your faith. Why? Isn't it because you are ashamed of Islam of it? On one hand you defend what your heart says to be true, and on the other hand you are too embarrassed to openly associate yourself with this cult of idiocy. So you declare yourself a non-Muslim and try to defend your faith from the position of impartiality. 

That is perfectly okay. I can see through you but I am not blaming you. I am very pleased to see that you are smart enough to not want to reveal your faith in Islam publicly. I don't think you are being a hypocrite liar. I think you are on your way to enlightenment. You have taken the first step. It is only a matter of time that you sever your umbilical cord from this evil cult and join us to eradicate it. You are an intelligent man and your intellect is now battling your irrational faith. Faith resides in our primitive brain. It is utterly irrational, stupid and ludicrous and yet it is persisting. It is not going to go away easily, but once you have reached this stage that on conscious level you feel embarrassed of it, it is only a matter of time that you would free yourself from it completely.  

 

[6] Ibn Sa’d Tabaghat v. 2 p. 1-2

 

back     

 

Comment here 

 

 

 

 

Articles Op-ed Authors Debates Leaving Islam FAQ
Comments Library Gallery Video Clips Books Sina's Challenge
 

  ©  copyright You may translate and publish the articles in this site only if you provide a link to the original page.