Descent into Dhimmitude
By J. Peter Pham & Michael I. Krauss
2006/03/30
TCS Daily
While most media accounts of the "cartoon jihad" focused on
the publication of the cartoons, and on the ensuing violent
reaction by some Muslims -- who were depicted by the much of the press as
victims! -- few reporters have ventured to describe the increasingly
hostile climate that Muslim extremists had succeeded in creating in
Denmark before the publication. In fact, an examination of Jyllands-Posten's
own pages reveals why its editors likely decided to publish the cartoons
in the first place -- as well as why the obscurantist rioters were so
confident that they would prevail.
In late 2004 -- a University of Copenhagen professor of Moroccan Jewish
descent -- was kidnapped in broad daylight and brutally beaten by three
Muslim youths for the "crime" of having read from the Quran
during a lecture. A few months later, a Danish publisher used anonymous
translators for an essay collection critical of Islam for fear that any
named assistant would suffer a similar fate. And in an incident
immediately preceding Jyllands-Posten's decision to run the
cartoons as a test of self-censorship, Danish artists refused to
illustrate a children's book about Muhammad.
These incidents, all disturbing, don't even scratch the surface of the
appeasement Danes have made to accommodate the people who unleashed
violence against them. In Copenhagen's public schools, the only food
available to students -- regardless of their religious affiliation or lack
thereof -- are Halal (prepared according to Islamic dietary requirements).
In Denmark, a country which enjoys well-deserved praise for the courage
with which citizens came together to save its small Jewish community
during World War II, Danish Jewish students today cannot attend certain
public schools because their very presence is viewed by administrators as
"provocative" to radicalized Muslim peers. The country's only
Jewish school, Copenhagen's 300-pupil Carolineskolen, founded in 1805,
nowadays is constrained to operate behind a double ring of barbed wire.
Naser Khader, the Damascus-born son of a Palestinian father and Syrian
mother who has served as a Danish parliamentarian from the Social Liberal
Party since 1994, now lives under round-the-clock police protection
because he committed the "crime" of giving his daughter a kafir
("infidel," read "Western") name. Compounding his
"apostasy," he founded a moderate Muslim group with over 700
members, Democratic Muslims, after the outbreak of the "cartoon
jihad" to campaign against Islamic establishmentarianism. Imam Ahmad
Abu Laban -- the same character who instigated Middle Eastern anti-Danish
riots with his portfolio of doctored cartoons -- then labeled Mr. Khader
and his supporters "rats in a hole." One of the members of
Khader's new group, Iranian refugee Kamran Tahmesabi, recently told a
Belgian newspaper, "It is an irony that I am today living in a
European democratic state and have to fight the same religious fanatics
that I fled from in Iran many years ago."
After the "cartoon jihad" had seemingly run its course, this
past February 12, the Danish chapter of the radical group Hizb ut-Tahrir
availed itself of the Scandinavian country's "decadent" freedoms
to hold a meeting in the Copenhagen neighborhood of Nørrebro, where it
attempted to stoke the flames of hatred. The participants at this
gathering minced no words about the "infidels" who populate
their country. Leader Fadi Abdullatif (who had previously received a
60-day sentence for threatening to kill Jews) turned his wrath on
Denmark's popular bicycle-riding sovereign, Queen Margarethe II, whom he
accused of involvement in a "conspiracy" with Jyllands-Posten
and Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen to "harm Islam." The
state prosecutor, under pressure from Muslim groups, declined to bring
charges.
Historically, non-Muslim minorities (i.e., Jews and Christians) could
escape the ravages of violent jihad only by surrendering to Islamic
domination through a treaty of agreed-upon subjugation and oppression (dhimma)
that turned them into "protected persons" (dhimmis) with
second class status within the real of Islam. Today, it seems that even
non-Muslim majorities are requested to descend into dhimmitude to
avoid the wrath of some new immigrants. But, to paraphrase our own
American Freedom Marchers, we are citizens, not dhimmis. Of course, once
one has let oneself be treated like a dhimmi, it becomes hard to protest.
J. Peter Pham is director of the Nelson Institute for International
and Public Affairs at James Madison University. Michael I. Krauss is
professor of law at George Mason University School of Law. Both are
academic fellows of the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies
|