Karen (not a
Muslim)
Just one thought I would like to
mention to you.
How long has
religion been around in one form or another? Have the overwhelming
majority of human beings believed in some kind of God throughout history?
How does your intellect explain this?
Which is
more logical to believe.....
1) That all these people were
and are intellectually inferior to you (sorry to sound sarcastic) and a few
enlightened others? or....
2) That human beings need to
believe in a deity, the spiritual.
If
you agree that the second statement is the more logical, how do you explain
this? Has evolution fail us so miserably that it has left us with an
incredibly strong need for something that does not exist? Is this the
logical thought? Is there any other human drive of this strength that is
so purposeless? I propose that it is not illogical to assume that
this need exists because the spiritual exists.
Manmade religions are one issue. It is very easy to expose the many
flaws in their attempts to define this deity. The existence of some kind
of spiritual plane is another issue.
Karen
BTW...I am not a Muslim
Dear
Karen,
The
fact that the majority of people believe in something is no proof of the truth
of that thing. As Bertrand Russell said, considering the silliness of people, a
crazy thought would have a better acceptance than a sound one. As a matter of
fact many cultures do not believe in any God, e.g. the Chinese and the Buddhists
are agnostics or atheists.
Until
a few centuries ago all humanity thought that the Earth is flat and they had
this belief for thousands of years. This universal consensus did not make their
belief right. Of course this is no proof that my views are right either. But not
because I am in minority I am necessarily wrong. We have to discuss the validity
of the belief in God and religions by their own merits and logics not by the
number of people believing in them.
It
is however true that many humans need to believe in a deity. But this does not
mean that the evolution has failed us just because this deity is imaginary and
not real. This very belief is a defense mechanism. The belief may not be true
but the effect of that is very real.
Children
who are bullied often imagine a powerful friend who would come to their rescue
and take vengeance on their behalf. In fact this is not reserved to children.
Even adults who are oppressed have reveries of becoming superman and punish
those who have oppressed them. These thought are not real yet they help the
victims to cope and receive justice, even if that justice is imaginary.
In
the past the world was a very unsafe place to live (even without the Islamic
terrorists). There were wars, neighboring countries often attacked and killed
everyone. There were diseases that no one could cure. There were natural
disasters (acts of God) that wreaked havoc. Vis-à-vis these disasters man had
to invent a god and take refuge in that deity. Today we can prove that such god
is an absurdity. It is a logical impossibility. Yet the belief in such manmade
god helped humanity to get through its stage of childhood.
This
god was never real. He never came to the rescue of any one. He never answered
any prayer. Innocent people suffered and injustice ruled. Yet the belief is a
deity that would not abandon us was soothing and helped us to get through our
dark moments of despair.
So
my answer is no, the evolution did not fail us. It helped us to get through our
moments of need.
Then
why not keep this false belief if it helped us so far? Because now we are
approaching the age of maturity! Today we no more need to believe in a deity
that would come to our succor in our moments of despair.
You also said, “Manmade religions
are one issue. It is very easy to expose the many flaws in their
attempts to define this deity. The existence of some kind of spiritual
plane is another issue.”
In this I agree with you. I do
not believe in a god but I do believe that this universe has a spiritual
dimension that is within us yet eludes our senses. I believe in the Single
Principle underlying the creation. I have written few articles on the subject of
God, if you read them you’ll see that I do not advocate atheism in the
traditional sense of the word.
Regards,
Ali Sina
|