|
Mr. Mohammed
Asadi, is the webmaster of rationalreality.50webs.com
Four years ago he came to this site and debated with the friends in the
forum. Here is his previous performance.
He writes in
good English and has also authored a book. One could say he is part of the
Islamic clerisy. Nonetheless once you read his essays you can see his
reasoning is no better than that of a 10 year old child and once he gets
warmed up he indulges in guff, insolence and insults and uses such a foul
language that troglodytes and yahoos look
philosophers in comparison. Here
is one sample of what this Muslim wrote in the forum.
| “Now,
will you take up my challenge to answer my article or will you keep
hiding in your damn hole where no light enters but where gasses
abound and e-coli has teeming colonies? Your tactics and your claims
prove that you are no better than human dung.” |
These days he is busy spamming the forum. He posts
the same message twenty times and he insults everyone. Check
out his messages in the forum He hopes the moderators lose patience
and ban him. Then he can say we banned him because of his "superior
logic". That is not going to happen. We may clean up the forum of the
repeated messages that he posts but we need him as a specimen to show to
the world what Islam does to human brain. He does us a great service. If
he was not a real person with a site and a book to his name, you could
have thought we have invented him to make Muslims look bad.
And this is a
Muslim “scholar”! Do not
assume that other Muslim scholars are different. Once reason fails, all of
them drop the mask and show you their real identity. Beneath the smiling
veneer of every Muslim, lurks a thug, a hooligan, a ruffian, a hoodlum.
Now let us see
the logical fallacies in which this Muslim engages. Here is his article of
which he is so impressed and thinks it’s irrefutable: http://www.faithfreedom.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=14707
The first
paragraph is the introduction to his drivel. It is nothing but
boastfulness and bravado. The only part worth mentioning is when he
accuses the critics of Islam of using “ad
hominem” against Muhammad. This Muslim obviously does not know the
meaning of ad hominem. Criticism
of Muhammad is not ad hominem.
He is the subject of the discussion. Of course we must talk about his
crimes and vices. How else can we show that he was a liar, a charlatan, a
rapist, or a thief? Ad hominem happens when Muslims, instead of defending
their religion, start attacking the person with whom they debate. In this
case attacking me, is ad hominem. I am not the one who has made the claim
to be a prophet. My character is absolutely irrelevant to my argument.
Even if I am shown to be “senile”, as Mr. Asadi calls me, this has
nothing to do with my charges against Muhammad. In fact it makes Islam
look even more false. If a senile can defeat this so called
religion, imagine how foolish it is to believe in it.
The argument
that this Muslim presents in his second paragraph is actually ludicrous.
He is saying that since more people die of other not Islam related causes,
such as, alcohol, tobacco, and crimes, we should not make too much ado
about deaths caused by Muslim terrorists. Instead, we should try to find
solutions to other causes of death. This is what he wrote:
| The
"lynch-mob" mentality of alarmism, of Islamic ideology as
a global threat, that was (and is) commonly portrayed in such
writings was also not justified: the number of terrorist acts
committed by those who claim to be Muslims and in the "name of
Islam" as a percentage of the total number of Muslims, even as
a percentage of the total number of crimes committed in the world,
are statistically insignificant as cause. The numbers of people
harmed by such acts (of criminals) are also far less than the number
that have been killed in the name of "democracy and
freedom" and free markets: a look at the military adventures of
the U.S. elite in the post World War 2 era should suffice as
empirical evidence. Also, the FBI estimates that around 19,000
Americans are murdered every year, not by Middle Eastern terrorists
but by fellow Americans. The alcohol and tobacco companies by
selling highly addictive and harmful products collectively kill over
400,000 Americans a year, year in and year out; however these
anti-Islam “humanitarians” do not condemn such “polite”
killings by these corporations. |
I don’t think
this argument really needs any response. Basically what he is saying is:
“close your eyes to Islamic terrorism and forget about it so we can
continue killing you, bombing you and massacring your children. Meanwhile
you think about how to overcome the problem of cigarette addiction.” Is
this man a joker or a scholar?
In the front
page of this site I have placed a dynamic link to thereligionofpeace.com
As you can see every day there are more terrorist attacks somewhere in the
world. Every day tens or hundreds of people are bombed, beheaded, killed
and their bodies are torn into pieces by the followers of this "religion
of peace". And this Muslim wants us to look the other way and talk
about the dangers of smoking. If this was not so tragic, it would be
funny.
This Muslim (I
find the word "Muslim" very derogatory and insulting. It is
synonymous to stupid, barbarian, thug, arrogant, brain dead, zombie,
hooligan, goon, shameless, savage and many other ignoble things. I don’t
know whether this most disgusting word elicits the same meanings in you or
not. So when I want to show my despise of someone I call him
"Muslim". But because Muslims are stupid, they don’t know all
these things and they are proud of this name. This is a win/win situation
because I insult them and they are happy and thank me for it. Isn't that
smart?) Anyway, this Muslim
then makes the ridiculous claim that “Islam
has the strongest organized social justice component within its system”.
Yes, actually Muslims love big talk. See what he wrote:
next >
|
