As for Arab scholars, they are just as brain dead as
the rest of Muslims. If they could think rationally they would leave Islam
too. Those of them that come to their senses leave this cult.
Other Arabs who are not infected by the mental disease of Islam
have managed to produce Surahs a hundred times superior to the Quran, with
no grammatical or logical errors and with no violence. You can’t see
this truth because you are a believer and as such biased. When have you
seen a believer make a fair judgment about his own faith? Such a thing has
never happened and it will never happen. It’s an oxymoron.
A word of warning. If you dare to comment on the linguistic analysis
below I will only continue this discourse with you if you actually
show that what I am saying is not the case i.e. detailed analysis to
show my examples are wrong. If you can not then, it was nice
debating with you.
Below are the
linguistic features I mentioned in my second email.
Throughout the Qur'an,
we encounter many linguistic features which can be taken as evidence
of its inimitable linguistic nature and that it is a divinely
revealed scripture; among these linguistic features are [Please note
I have not expanded on all of them as that would take forever, if
you require the explanations for the rest of the features you will
have to wait for my book or read the books I have mentioned in the
previous emails]: |
I see you are putting online your entire book and want me to refute
it. Let me tell you that apart from maintaining this site I have my own
books to write and have no time for discussing yours. Once again I urge
you to be brief and succinct.
All I have to show is that you have no foot to stand on and whatever you
say about the Quran being linguistically a miracle is nonsense. So please
start with your strongest arguments. I am not going to discuss your
entire book. Once I prove your arguments are logical fallacies I will
leave you. You are most welcome to continue in the forum of this site
where you'll find scholars more erudite than yours truly. But I have more
important things to do than go through your entire book. Once it becomes
clear that you are defeated, I leave you. I don't enjoy torturing the
fallen.
Furthermore the mere fact that the Quran does not fall into any
category does not prove that it is from God. It just shows that the author
was an illiterate man who did not know the correct way of writing. He was
often corrected by his scribe Abdullah
Ibn Abi Sarh and because of that ibn Abi Sarh realized Muhammad is
laying and left Islam.
You must show us that the Quran is superior and inimitable, like
Shakespeare, Dante or Ferdowsi. Even though Shakespeare, Dante and
Ferdowsi are inimitable, no one thinks they were divine. Muhammad had a
big mole between his shoulders. He
claimed this is the sign of his prophethood. That is ludicrous. Where
does it say having a big mole between the shoulders is the sign of
prophethood? Do you see how ludicrous were Muhammad's "proofs"?
This logical fallacy is called non sequitur. A non sequitur is an argument where the conclusion is
drawn from premises which aren't logically connected with it. So first you
have to prove that the Quran is indeed inimitable and superior, a task
which you won’t be able to accomplish because much superior books in the
same style of the Quran have been written by Arab Christians. And then you
must prove that this superiority is proof that Muhammad was a prophet of
God. No one can compose music like Mozart and yet no one thinks he was a
prophet.
Anyway, don’t worry about the second step. You won’t reach there
because you won’t be able to prove that the Quran in inimitable. All you
would be able to show that it is unique. That we already agree. All humans
are unique, and so is their brain and how they write. However, this
uniqueness of the Quran does not constitute superiority. The Quran is a
very asinine book which shows its author was indeed an illiterate man or
one with very little knowledge of language and science.
Syntactic Features:
Quranic discourse is
characterised by syntactic constructions which display fascinating
unique linguistic architecture where the permutation of constituents
plays a significant role in the interior and exterior linguistic
construction. This is explained in the following cases.
Chandelier Structures:
In this type of
modified complex constructions a series of modifying units are
employed successively in a form of modifying clusters; in this type
of complex structures, chandelier like clauses/phrases illuminate
i.e. modify the noun (phrase). This is explained in the following
figure:
http://www.theinimitablequran.com/examplechandelierstructure.bmp
[A
similitude of the Garden which those who keep their duty (to Allah)
are promised: therein are rivers of water unpolluted
and rivers of milk whereof the flavour changeth not,
and the rivers of wine delicious to the drinkers,
and rivers of clear-run honey;
therein for them is every kind of fruit, with pardon from their
Lord. Q47:15]
In this example we
find a unique Quranic linguistic phenomenon which is that of
numerical symmetry; the core word of each cluster has a numerical
symmetry, i.e. has the same number of letters; the first four
clusters have four core words, each consists of three letters only;
while the last two clusters have two core words, each consists of
five letters. |
Here is that verse in Arabic broken in "clusters"
as per your instruction.
مَثَلُ
الْجَنَّةِ
الَّتِي
وُعِدَ
الْمُتَّقُونَ
فِيهَا
أَنْهَارٌ
مِّن مَّاء
غَيْرِ آسِنٍ
وَأَنْهَارٌ
مِن لَّبَنٍ
لَّمْ
يَتَغَيَّرْ
طَعْمُهُ
وَأَنْهَارٌ
مِّنْ خَمْرٍ
لَّذَّةٍ
لِّلشَّارِبِينَ
وَأَنْهَارٌ
مِّنْ عَسَلٍ
مُّصَفًّى
وَلَهُمْ
فِيهَا مِن
كُلِّ الثَّمَرَاتِ
وَمَغْفِرَةٌ
مِّن
رَّبِّهِمْ
كَمَنْ
هُوَ خَالِدٌ
فِي النَّارِ
وَسُقُوا
مَاء
حَمِيمًا
فَقَطَّعَ
أَمْعَاءهُمْ
I suppose the
core letters of the first four clusters you are talking about are مَّاء
water لَّبَن
milk خَمْر wine
and عَسَلٍ
honey, which I
have marked in red.
First of all مَّاء
at the end of ء is not a letter. Can you show ء
used in the middle or the beginning of any word? ء
is an accent, a hamza, dear Hamza and not a letter.
But let us say it is a letter and مَّاء
has three
letters. So what? Why this should be a miracle? Muhammad is using four
Arabic words that happen to have three letters.
What part of this is miraculous?
Even if all the six "core words" in the
above verse had the same number of letters, it still is no proof that the
Quran is a miracle.
Why Muslims think such a banal thing is a miracle? I
tell you why. It is because Muslims are desperate. They suffer from low
self esteem. They see the stupidity of their faith and see how they have
lagged behind everyone else, in science, technology, economy and
civilization and to boost their sagging egos and lift up their hurt
pride, they try to find miracles in the Quran. They fool no one but
themselves but that is the whole idea. They must keep their faith alive
and anything will do. Why don't they leave Islam? It's because the
psychopath Muhammad has robbed them from their identity, selfhood and
dignity. They have nothing left to fall back. They despise their ancestral
culture. They have to cling to Islam at all cost. One day they claim that Neil
Armstrong heard Azan when he landed on the Moon. The next day they say
an skeleton of a 10 meter tall man has
been unearthed. This is to back up the claim of Muhammad that Adam was 30
meters tall and ever since human race has been shrinking in size.
Then they find evidence that the Moon
has been split as it was said in the Quran 54.
and many hadiths. And then they say that the Quran has numerical miracles. Now, you my poor
friend, are wasting your precious life and instead of doing something
positive that would help mankind, are writing a book about the chandeliers
in the Quran. What is the purpose of that book? Does it have any other
value except a feel good factor?
You can find peculiarities much more interesting than this
in any text. All you have to do is use your imagination. What you are
doing is the sign of desperation and lack of intellectual acumen.
You draw the above diagram
and then claim that the Quran has "chandelier structure".
Don't you think this can be done with any writing? [for those who don't
read Arabic, in each box in this diagram, Mr. Hamza Tzortzis has put one
of his "clusters" that I published above as a list. He thinks it
is more fanciful if he represents it as chandelier.] Is this the miracle
you are talking about dear Hamza? Like your prophet you are inventing your
own rules. Aren't you embarrassed of making this much fool of yourself? No
wonder you became distressed when I published your picture. You are not
certainly in any danger of being assassinated by non-Muslims. It looks
like you are ashamed of your performance. That is a good sign. Shame
works. I want you to feel ashamed for believing in this stupid cult and
for talking nonsense in its defense. If you have already started feeling
shame then congratulate yourself. You are on your way to enlightenment.
Many Muslims are so tick that don't know what is shame.
I know reason will not
work with Muslims. But shame works at least on those who are still salvageable.
I want to put you to shame because I want to save you. It's for your
own good. You'll thank me once you come out of this misery called Islam. But if you don't wake up. If this makes you retreat into
your shell and become hardened, it does not matter. You are dispensable. I
want to show the stupidity of Islam and the intellectual bankruptcy of its
clerisy to thousands of Muslim youths that read this site. It is for them
that I write. You and your kind are already write offs. If you are saved,
it is a bonus but I don't count on you. Once these youths see the light
and turn their backs on you and your ilk, your books will be thrown in the
dustbin and once you have no one to fool with your ridiculous tale of
chandelier, hopefully you too will come out of your coma. We all need
approval and encouragement. That includes you and I. If no one read my
site, I certainly would quit writing. If no one read your chandelier
nonsense you would not write such a ridiculous book.
Chandelier Structures? Multi-Tiered Structures? Long Argumentative
Structures? Hysteron and Proteron? How one can be any more ridiculous?
People of the world are trying to find cure for cancer, AIDS, and even
overcome death. They are discovering the mysteries of the universe and
pushing forward the frontiers of human knowledge. And what Muslims do?
They are busy finding "chandeliers" in the most idiotic book
ever written. Isn't that pathetic? Everything you see around you, is
the fruit of the knowledge of non-Muslims. What Muslims have done for
humanity or for themselves?
Look at the result! While the rest of the world is
advancing, Muslims are regressing. Virtually every Islamic country is
worse today than it was thirty years ago. Why is that so? It is because
Muslims, instead of going after true science, waste their brain cells finding "miracles" in the
Quran to hide the colossal bankruptcy of this most moronic of cults. This
is psychopathology. This is insanity.
Be careful your chandelier does not fall on your head
for it does not seem to be sustained by anything.
<
back
To be continued
|