Home

 Articles

 Op-ed

 Authors

 FAQ

 Leaving Islam
 Library
 Gallery
 Comments
 Debates
  Links
 Forum

 

 

 

As for Arab scholars, they are just as brain dead as the rest of Muslims. If they could think rationally they would leave Islam too. Those of them that come to their senses leave this cult. Other Arabs who are not infected by the mental disease of Islam have managed to produce Surahs a hundred times superior to the Quran, with no grammatical or logical errors and with no violence. You can’t see this truth because you are a believer and as such biased. When have you seen a believer make a fair judgment about his own faith? Such a thing has never happened and it will never happen. It’s an oxymoron.

 

A word of warning. If you dare to comment on the linguistic analysis below I will only continue this discourse with you if you actually show that what I am saying is not the case i.e. detailed analysis to show my examples are wrong. If you can not then, it was nice debating with you.  

Below are the linguistic features I mentioned in my second email.  

Throughout the Qur'an, we encounter many linguistic features which can be taken as evidence of its inimitable linguistic nature and that it is a divinely revealed scripture; among these linguistic features are [Please note I have not expanded on all of them as that would take forever, if you require the explanations for the rest of the features you will have to wait for my book or read the books I have mentioned in the previous emails]:

I see you are putting online your entire book and want me to refute it. Let me tell you that apart from maintaining this site I have my own books to write and have no time for discussing yours. Once again I urge you to be brief and succinct. All I have to show is that you have no foot to stand on and whatever you say about the Quran being linguistically a miracle is nonsense. So please start with your strongest arguments.  I am not going to discuss your entire book. Once I prove your arguments are logical fallacies I will leave you. You are most welcome to continue in the forum of this site where you'll find scholars more erudite than yours truly. But I have more important things to do than go through your entire book. Once it becomes clear that you are defeated, I leave you. I don't enjoy torturing the fallen. 

Furthermore the mere fact that the Quran does not fall into any category does not prove that it is from God. It just shows that the author was an illiterate man who did not know the correct way of writing. He was often corrected by his scribe Abdullah Ibn Abi Sarh and because of that ibn Abi Sarh realized Muhammad is laying and left Islam. 

You must show us that the Quran is superior and inimitable, like Shakespeare, Dante or Ferdowsi. Even though Shakespeare, Dante and Ferdowsi are inimitable, no one thinks they were divine. Muhammad had a big mole between his shoulders. He claimed this is the sign of his prophethood. That is ludicrous. Where does it say having a big mole between the shoulders is the sign of prophethood? Do you see how ludicrous were Muhammad's "proofs"? This logical fallacy is called non sequitur. A non sequitur is an argument where the conclusion is drawn from premises which aren't logically connected with it. So first you have to prove that the Quran is indeed inimitable and superior, a task which you won’t be able to accomplish because much superior books in the same style of the Quran have been written by Arab Christians. And then you must prove that this superiority is proof that Muhammad was a prophet of God. No one can compose music like Mozart and yet no one thinks he was a prophet.

Anyway, don’t worry about the second step. You won’t reach there because you won’t be able to prove that the Quran in inimitable. All you would be able to show that it is unique. That we already agree. All humans are unique, and so is their brain and how they write. However, this uniqueness of the Quran does not constitute superiority. The Quran is a very asinine book which shows its author was indeed an illiterate man or one with very little knowledge of language and science. 

 

Syntactic Features:  

Quranic discourse is characterised by syntactic constructions which display fascinating unique linguistic architecture where the permutation of constituents plays a significant role in the interior and exterior linguistic construction. This is explained in the following cases.  

Chandelier Structures:  

In this type of modified complex constructions a series of modifying units are employed successively in a form of modifying clusters; in this type of complex structures, chandelier like clauses/phrases illuminate i.e. modify the noun (phrase). This is explained in the following figure:  

http://www.theinimitablequran.com/examplechandelierstructure.bmp  

[A similitude of the Garden which those who keep their duty (to Allah) are promised: therein are rivers of water unpolluted and rivers of milk whereof the flavour changeth not, and the rivers of wine delicious to the drinkers, and rivers of clear-run honey; therein for them is every kind of fruit, with pardon from their Lord. Q47:15]  

In this example we find a unique Quranic linguistic phenomenon which is that of numerical symmetry; the core word of each cluster has a numerical symmetry, i.e. has the same number of letters; the first four clusters have four core words, each consists of three letters only; while the last two clusters have two core words, each consists of five letters.

Here is that verse in Arabic broken in "clusters" as per your instruction.

مَثَلُ الْجَنَّةِ الَّتِي وُعِدَ الْمُتَّقُونَ فِيهَا

 أَنْهَارٌ مِّن مَّاء غَيْرِ آسِنٍ

 وَأَنْهَارٌ مِن لَّبَنٍ لَّمْ يَتَغَيَّرْ طَعْمُهُ

 وَأَنْهَارٌ مِّنْ خَمْرٍ لَّذَّةٍ لِّلشَّارِبِينَ

 وَأَنْهَارٌ مِّنْ عَسَلٍ مُّصَفًّى

 وَلَهُمْ فِيهَا مِن كُلِّ الثَّمَرَاتِ

 وَمَغْفِرَةٌ مِّن رَّبِّهِمْ

 كَمَنْ هُوَ خَالِدٌ فِي النَّارِ وَسُقُوا مَاء حَمِيمًا فَقَطَّعَ أَمْعَاءهُمْ

I suppose the core letters of the first four clusters you are talking about are مَّاء water لَّبَن milk خَمْر   wine and عَسَلٍ   honey, which I have marked in red.

First of all مَّاء at the end of ء is not a letter. Can you show ء  used in the middle or the beginning of any word? ء is an accent, a hamza, dear Hamza and not a letter. 

But let us say it is a letter and مَّاء  has three letters. So what? Why this should be a miracle? Muhammad is using four Arabic words that happen to have three letters.  What part of this is miraculous?

Even if all the six "core words" in the above verse had the same number of letters, it still is no proof that the Quran is a miracle. 

Why Muslims think such a banal thing is a miracle? I tell you why. It is because Muslims are desperate. They suffer from low self esteem. They see the stupidity of their faith and see how they have lagged behind everyone else, in science, technology, economy and civilization and to boost their sagging egos and lift up their hurt pride, they try to find miracles in the Quran. They fool no one but themselves but that is the whole idea. They must keep their faith alive and anything will do. Why don't they leave Islam? It's because the psychopath Muhammad has robbed them from their identity, selfhood and dignity. They have nothing left to fall back. They despise their ancestral culture. They have to cling to Islam at all cost. One day they claim that Neil Armstrong heard Azan when he landed on the Moon. The next day they say an skeleton of a 10 meter tall man has been unearthed. This is to back up the claim of Muhammad that Adam was 30 meters tall and ever since human race has been shrinking in size.  Then they find evidence that the Moon has been split as it was said in the Quran 54. and many hadiths. And then they say that the Quran has numerical miracles. Now, you my poor friend, are wasting your precious life and instead of doing something positive that would help mankind, are writing a book about the chandeliers in the Quran. What is the purpose of that book? Does it have any other value except a feel good factor?  

You can find peculiarities much more interesting than this in any text. All you have to do is use your imagination. What you are doing is the sign of desperation and lack of intellectual acumen.  

You draw the above diagram and then claim that the Quran has "chandelier structure".  Don't you think this can be done with any writing? [for those who don't read Arabic, in each box in this diagram, Mr. Hamza Tzortzis has put one of his "clusters" that I published above as a list. He thinks it is more fanciful if he represents it as chandelier.] Is this the miracle you are talking about dear Hamza? Like your prophet you are inventing your own rules. Aren't you embarrassed of making this much fool of yourself? No wonder you became distressed when I published your picture. You are not certainly in any danger of being assassinated by non-Muslims. It looks like you are ashamed of your performance. That is a good sign. Shame works. I want you to feel ashamed for believing in this stupid cult and for talking nonsense in its defense. If you have already started feeling shame then congratulate yourself. You are on your way to enlightenment. Many Muslims are so tick that don't know what is shame.  

I know reason will not work with Muslims. But shame works at least on those who are still salvageable. I want to put you to shame because I want to save you.  It's for your own good. You'll thank me once you come out of this misery called Islam. But if you don't wake up. If this makes you retreat into your shell and become hardened, it does not matter. You are dispensable. I want to show the stupidity of Islam and the intellectual bankruptcy of its clerisy to thousands of Muslim youths that read this site. It is for them that I write. You and your kind are already write offs. If you are saved, it is a bonus but I don't count on you. Once these youths see the light and turn their backs on you and your ilk, your books will be thrown in the dustbin and once you have no one to fool with your ridiculous tale of chandelier, hopefully you too will come out of your coma. We all need approval and encouragement. That includes you and I. If no one read my site, I certainly would quit writing. If no one read your chandelier nonsense you would not write such a ridiculous book.  

Chandelier Structures? Multi-Tiered Structures? Long Argumentative Structures? Hysteron and Proteron? How one can be any more ridiculous? People of the world are trying to find cure for cancer, AIDS, and even overcome death. They are discovering the mysteries of the universe and pushing forward the frontiers of human knowledge. And what Muslims do? They are busy finding "chandeliers" in the most idiotic book ever written. Isn't that pathetic? Everything you see around you, is the fruit of the knowledge of non-Muslims. What Muslims have done for humanity or for themselves? 

Look at the result! While the rest of the world is advancing, Muslims are regressing. Virtually every Islamic country is worse today than it was thirty years ago. Why is that so? It is because Muslims, instead of going after true science, waste their brain cells  finding "miracles" in the Quran to hide the colossal bankruptcy of this most moronic of cults. This is psychopathology. This is insanity. 

Be careful your chandelier does not fall on your head for it does not seem to be sustained by anything.  

 

back 

To be continued

 

 

 

 

 

 

Articles Op-ed Authors Debates Leaving Islam FAQ
Comments Library Gallery Video Clips Books Sina's Challenge
 

  ©  copyright You may translate and publish the articles in this site only if you provide a link to the original page.