Exegesis
of Muslim and Islamic Minds
Syed Kamran
Mirza
Understanding and analyzing Muslim or Islamic
mindsets is not an easy job! Islam is the only religion which teaches
Islamic brotherhood, that is, only a Muslim is the brother of another
Muslim and a non-Muslim can not be a brother of any Muslim. Needless to
mention that it was the same theory (Islamic virus) worked behind the
mindsets of entire Arab nations who could not see any fairness for
Bangalees freedom in 1971. They all supported marauding Paki-monster who
were raping and killing millions of Bangalees (not
so good muslims) only to save Islam. In this essay I will try to
analyze some pertinent symptoms of Islamic brotherhood which was
instrumental/pretext to the phenomenal Jihadi protests against Iraq war by
all Muslims around the world.
In general many people of many countries including
USA and Britain (real perpetrators) protested against Iraq war. Some
people do protest any war, especially left-leaning folks living in the
western world and leftists/communists in the Third world countries also do
protest almost any war. In fact all people hate war though some times war
becomes an essential means of saving humanity.
Leftists are staunch enemy of America, because they consider
America destroyed their dream of communism, that�s why. Now all
Islamists do hate America because Islamists consider America as the
biggest obstacle to their ardent dream of establishing real Islam on
Allah�s earth. Islamists also can not tolerate America and the west
because they blame west for their own failure.
We have seen this kind of protests during Vietnam
War. Of course, Islamic folks did not bother/mind Uncle Sam�s utterly
unjust war in Vietnam, because in those days of whipping communists by
America, Islamists were having honeymoon with the Uncle Sam. Same was the
case when NATO was whipping and beating hard on the back of Milosalav�s
Sarbia, because at that time�it was Christian brothers whipping another
Christian bad guy. Nothing was wrong in it! But it was puzzling to me why
Most Muslims staunchly supported Iraqi Dictator.
I demanded and still claim that this was just
because Saddam is a Tyrant but Muslim Dictator.
If he was not a Muslim dictator, or America attacked North Korea, no
Muslim would ever bother about this war at all. Why
I believe so? Please be with me for a few minutes.
Please just
take the case of the war protest Bangladeshi style or should I say
Moderate Muslim style:
1) It
was not an ordinary protest by Muslims along with other nations in the
world. These protests by Muslims through out the world were much special
and gave the color of holy war or Islamic Jihad (to save Islam form the
hands of infidels), and not just mere protest like other peoples in many
country. Among the jihadi maneuvers Bangladesh (BD) is the champion of
all. BD is the only country which has observed a day of Hartal for Iraq war.
Here is how BD Muslims did the jihadi holy maneuvers
to please Allah (SBT). Bangladesh was having super-tumultuous days of wide
spread protests against Iraq war. No, not by leftists/communists at all.
It was done by Pukka Tupi-clad Muslims (Mullahs, maulanas, Madrasha�s
students, Islamic political parties, even women Muslimaahs with Hijabs and
Burkhas.) with myriads of anti-kaffir and anti-infidels vitriolic slogans
full of Islamic curse. Hundreds
of thousands of Tupi-clad Bangalee Muslims were in the streets of every
city and every Bazars of Bangladesh (repeatedly appeared, not just one
time) with Islamic/Jihadi anger�chanting various poisonous slogans and
demonstrated various postures of Jumping (Nordon,
Kurdon). These jihadi Muslims of Bangladesh did something which no
other Muslims did. Bangladeshi protesters performed mass-prayers (Gano-munazat).
Tens of thousands of pukka, tupi-clad
angry muslims massively laid down in the open asphalt road on their back
and simultaneously raised their hands towards the sky and prayed to Allah
to help defeat American
infidels by their favorite Muslin Saddam. Not only that, they conducted mass-prayers in every Mosque after Zumma
Prayers and also during regular five times prayers Jihad Protesters also
damaged many private cars and some foreign business establishments. What
is called: Madness of Islamic Umma (Ummabazeer
Ummadona)
What an Islamic zeal? Does anybody believe that this
kind of jihadi support to Saddam was just for mere humanity sake? You must
be kidding folks!
2) Thousands of BD jihadi muslims enlisted for
suicide bombing operation against Kaffirs. 1,200
to join 'suicide squad' from
Bangladesh Staff Correspondent
Daily
Star. Please click here
to see the sensational news.
Does anybody still consider that these Bangalee
suicide heroes are enlisting their name just to show sympathy for
humanity? Was there anybody from Bangladesh to join the suicide squad for
Vietnam War? Folks, you must be again kidding or just lying with people.
3) In BD and elsewhere in the Muslim world, tens of
thousands of new born baby got the name of their hero��Saddam�.
Saddam was so popular in BD that hundreds of thousands of
Saddam�s portraits and also Osama�s portraits were sold with high
price in the streets of Dhaka and other cities in Bangladesh.
Is there any
Muslim brother who can still claim that, their protests against Iraq war
was simply a case of humane gesture?
Media Puzzles:
There were two sets of Medias broadcasting war news since the
beginning of the Iraq war: (1) Western Medias like CNN, MSNBC, BBC etc.
and (2) Al-Jazeera and other Arab Medias. Surprisingly these two groups
were generating war coverage quite contrast/contradictory to each other.
That is if you believed that Al-Jazeera and Arab Medias were talking the
truth, then CNN or MSNBC were giving blatant lies about the war and vice
versa. Bangladeshi Muslims
were listening news which was Al-Jazeera generated and they did not listen
or believe any news which was generated by western Medias. Because Aljazeera was broadcasting news that
most Muslims ardently wanted to hear about Iraq war.
In Bangladesh and also all those Arab world the main
news was that Saddam was winning the war and America was losing the war
with much devastations to it�s army. On 5th April I got some
visitors from Bangladesh and Holland. They are Bangalee Muslims and all of
them were vehemently arguing that Iraq was winning the war. When I asked
what was there source of news, they replied: �Al-Jazeera and BTV and
they told me CNN and other Western Medias are giving distorted one-sided
news�. When I took them in front of the TV set which was broadcasting
CNN evening news they said, �CNN is giving wrong/distorted news�. I
understood they do not like CNN or MSNBC because these Medias do not
provide news they want to hear. One of them claimed that CNN and MSNBC
give 90% false news. Then I urge them to decide who is telling the truth
after the end of the war. They agreed with me.
One of them brought for me 12 Bangladeshi daily news
papers (like Jankantha, Ajker kagoz,
Prothom alo, Inkelab etc.) dated April 3 and 4, 2003. All those BD
news papers had many colorful headings of news about Iraq war. When I
quickly glanced all of them�I could not believe my eyes what I was
reading. By reading these BD news paper one will surely get the idea that
Saddam was winning the war. News papers were loaded with pictures of
American atrocities (civilian casualties) and stories about Saddam�s
valiant soldiers. Some of the headings I still remember are: �Coalition
forces were halted by Saddam,s valiant forces, Coalition command and
control were shattered, 39 US tanks were destroyed, 14 US fighter jets
were shot down, 150 coalition soldiers were killed and many US soldiers
surrendered to Saddam heroic Soldiers, US Helicopters downed by Iraqi
peasant, Baghdad will be flooded with bloods of coalition forces, etc.
etc. No news about the dynamic success of coalition forces at all. I was
shocked by the gross bluffs that Al-Jazeera TV was broadcasting to satisfy
Muslim mindsets. I also heard from one of the CNN reporter who was telling
with much despair that�just in the neighboring Jordan Arabs are getting
totally different pictures of the war. It was not very difficult to
understand how BD newspapers were bluffing gullible Muslim readers.
My relative was not believing the news he was hearing
from American Media at all, and he was telling me that, �you will know
the truth when war is ended.� On 9th April when I was calling
him in front of the TV set he was almost crying with shock and utter
disbelief. He did not like to hear and see that news of the fall of
Baghdad, jubilant and joyous celebration of Iraqi people and statue
demolition scenarios of Baghdad. These people believed Iraqi information
minister�s Goebali version of war news. Did you see how information
minister al- Sahhaf was lying to the whole world? That�s the typical
character of any Muslim rulers. They lie profusely! We have seen same
thing in the early period of Afghan war last year. We have seen during
India Pakistan wars�when we used to hear that Pakistan was always
winning the war.
When I asked my BD relative why he was so shocked for
Saddam Hossain's fall knowing that he is an evil person? He replied,
�after all he was our Muslim brother and he was humiliated by non-Muslim
western infidels�. I was
surprised and dismayed by the zeal of utterly empty Islamic brotherhood. I
asked him do you remember that in our freedom struggle in 1971 no Arab
people supported us. He remained silent to my question.
Some puzzling
Questions:
Muslim Umma support Saddam because Saddam is a
Muslim! But in Islam making any statue of living object is greatly sinful
and Mullahs hate any statue. Iraq was flooded with Saddam�s all fancy
statues spending millions of Iraqi dollars everywhere. How come no
Muslims/mullahs ever protested about Saddam�s statues? I enjoyed the
euphoria of destroying Saddam�s mammoth statues by those Iraqi freedom
loving people. That was really something to remember for life. Looting
was also Iraqi style. I saw people looting cash or valuables, but I
never saw people looting almost anything they found in font of them. This
showed the real refection of many years of brutal repressions by
Saddam�s regime. This was not simply an act of lootings, but it was
payback or revenge to Saddam�s regime by oppressed Iraqi people..
Blaming
Electronic Media:
Islamists have a very funny way of judging
correctness and authenticity of Media news. Whenever western Media like
CNN or MSNBC broadcast something in their favor or likings they will try
to highlight it 100 folds. But the moment news goes against their
choice/likings�they will immediately call it western propaganda or
Zionist conspiracy. What a double standard by those Islamists!
News about war can never be 100% true, and there is
always some 10-20% distortion of the actual happening. Every news has some
flaws in it when it is broadcast, but we can easily find the substance of
the actual news. To my knowledge, western Medias are 70-90% true when
Medias of Asian countries (BD included) only 10-30% are true. I always
find CNN, MSNBC, BBC and many other western Medias quite acceptable and
they rank amongst the best in the whole world. In this case of Iraq war I
found 80-90% truth in the broadcasts of CNN, MSNBC and BBC, because they
broadcast war news with sufficient pictures which substantiated the claim.
At the end of the Iraq war (now) we can positively determine who spoke the
truth. Al-Jazeera and other Arab Medias were broadcasting 80-90% lies
about Iraq war. On the contrary, western Medias like CNN, MSNBC and BBC
were broadcasting about 80-90% true war news. That is what we are
witnessing now after the removal of Saddam. I have some questions to the
readers: (1) Please name some world
Media/Medias which is more open, more neutral and broadcasts more
authentic news than CNN, MSNBC or BBC. (2) Please give me one Third worlds
TV Media which will broadcast news from both sides (enemy and friend) of
the conflicts. (3) Could you tell us that any Media of some Muslim nation
is better than CNN, MSNBC or BBC?
Humanity
factor: Muslims and
especially Islamists widely blaming American (coalition) force for their
atrocity and inhumanity in the war of Iraq. They also claim that, they are
protesting this war for humanity sake. Every war causes some collateral
human casualty, but question is who can avoid this collateral damage
better than American? Also, will these collateral damages be more than the
damages/atrocities/killings (Saddam was killing 10-20 thousands Iraqis
every year) that would happened had there been Saddam stayed in power? Let
me ask my readers: who is better humane people in the world? I am not
saying America is any saint or angel. But do we have any better humane
people than westerners or Americans? Consider if this super power was some
Arab nation (say Saddam�s Iraq or Saudi Arabia) instead of America and
that Arab super power invaded a western infidel country. What would we see
there? Would they come with Billions of dollars worth of food, medicine
and other modern amenities to help the people of invaded country like
America did in Iraq? Let me ask some questions to my honorable readers: (1) Please name one country where I can find more humane/compassionate
human beings than America. (2) Please tell me which country gives more
economic aid to any Third World poor country than America. Was it any Arab
Muslim country? Please think about it for a moment!
Coalition
forces were invader or rescuers?
Images
speak thousands words! What have we seen for last several days
in Iraq? Have we seen Iraqis are mourning for Saddam, or have we seen that
majority Iraqis were sadden that Coalition forces have crushed Saddam�s
Republican guard? What was the indication of these: tumultuously
joyous jubilant celebrations of Iraqis, kissing the advancing marines by
Iraqi people, showering rose petals by Iraqi women over the American
tanks, joyously greeting American soldiers chanting/jumping/clapping with
euphoria of relief and happiness of freedom, chanting with various slogans
like�thank you America, thank you Bush, Bush Bush thank you Bush,
kissing the hands of Marines, euphoria of demolitions of all those Saddam�s mammoth statues, looting Iraqi Govt.
property etc.etc.etc. Were
these the signs of an invaded country or was it the sign of a liberated
country from the mighty hands of an unimaginable tyrant like Saddam? I can
not see anything parallel to this; I remember our joyous moments of 1971
when Indian army and our valiant freedom fighters entered Dhaka. But I don
not think that can be compared here because of the much superior intensity
and degree of joy Iraqi people were expressing in Baghdad and elsewhere in
Iraq after the fall of Saddam. I have not seen any Iraqis protesting as
much our BD muslims have exhibited with their Islamic zeal. I must bring
that famous Bengali adage: �Aunty shows more fervor in loving me than my
own mother (Mayyer chheye mashir doraad beshi).
Some after
thoughts:
My point here is�what type of Islamic mania is it
that Muslims can not separate good from the bad due to their blindness
caused by childhood brain-washing with Islamic brotherhood syndrome? How
come Muslim born human beings can never come out of the closed tunnels of
Islamic brotherhood and never can see the reality of the life?
Saddam was killing tens of thousands of Iraqi Muslims every year
for long 25 years, yet they are shedding crocodile�s tears for few
hundreds of collateral civilian killings? Who likes war or killing
innocent people? No body likes war and no body likes killings. But
sometimes war does happen to bring good for the world. In this case of
Iraq war, I strongly consider that Iraq was not occupied by anybody, but
Iraq has been finally liberated by America and Iraqi people will see the
sunshine after long times.
Interestingly enough, Iraqi Muslims ( except
Saddam�s supporters which is no more than 10% of Iraqi people)
overwhelmingly wanted this change to happen. And it was obvious that no
other country but super power America could do this job of removing this
Iraqi monster so precisely and successfully. Thanks
to Osama-Bin-Laden for his utter Islamic stupidity, otherwise America
would never have paid any attention to Iraq and mighty Saddam would have
ruled Iraq ruthlessly until his death. Of course, our Muslim folks would
not have bothered about Saddam�s tyranny.
How did Iraqi civilians (inside and outside Iraq)
respond to the coalition victory? Were they not happy by this
long-deserved freedom from the iron clutch of Saddam?
Have not we witnessed unbelievable massive jubilant celebrations in
the Iraqi streets? Why then we the outside Muslims were so unhappy about
Iraq war? Look what an Iraqi American said to CNN reporter on 8th
April, 2003. When asked how he (name not remember) was feeling about this
war of Iraq by America he replied he was very happy and hopeful about this
war. And then he angrily made this statement below: �Those Arabs protesting this war of Iraq are most cruel hypocrites. They
should be ashamed of their act of supporting a tyrant like Saddam in the
name of Muslim-sympathy, when they know very well that Saddam killed 3
millions of Iraqi Muslims. They should rather protest against their own
dictators�
Here is another comment from Baghdad people:
�I
am 49, but I never lived a single day,� said Yousuf Abed
kazim, a Baghdad Mosque Imam who pounded the statue�s pedestal with a
sledgehammer.
�Only now will I start living. That Saddam is a Murderer and
criminal.�
Folks, we surely live in a strange world. I have seen
ample doubts and disbelief even among some of my left-leaning secular and
semi-secular Muslim friends, who also felt sorry for the fall of
Saddam�s regime at the hands of western infidel forces. Perhaps, they
considered it as the humiliation of Muslim country by an infidel country.
May be these secular, left-leaning folks still possess some traces of
Islamic virus in their system. Who knows when they will be completely free
of Islamic prejudice and will be able to see things in the stature of
global brotherhood rather than Islamic brotherhood?
|