Is Russia Banning Islam?
Russia appears to be taking serious moves to combat the “radicalization” of Muslims within its border.
Recent pro-Islamic reports are complaining that Russia is banning the Islamic hijab—the headdress Islamic law requires Muslim women to wear—and, perhaps even more decisively, key Islamic scriptures, on the charge that they incite terrorism.
In the words of Arabic news site Elaph, “Russia is witnessing a relentless war on the hijab. It began in a limited manner but has grown in strength, prompting great concern among Russia’s Muslims.”
The report continues by saying that women wearing the hijab are being “harassed” especially in the “big cities”; that they are encountering difficulties getting jobs and being “subject to embarrassing situations in public areas and transportation. The situation has gotten to the point that even educational institutions, including universities, have issued decrees banning the wearing of the hijab altogether.”
Moscow’s Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University appears mentioned as one of the schools to ban the donning of the hijab on its premises, specifically, last September (the New York Times bemoaned an earlier instance of anti-hijab sentiment in 2013).
While this move against the hijab may appear as discriminatory against religious freedom, the flipside to all this—which perhaps Russia, with its significant Muslim population is aware of—is that, wherever the Islamic hijab proliferates, so too does Islamic supremacism and terrorism. Tawfik Hamid, a former aspiring Islamic jihadi, says that “the proliferation of the hijab is strongly correlated with increased terrorism…. Terrorism became much more frequent in such societies as Indonesia, Egypt, Algeria, and the U.K. after the hijab became prevalent among Muslim women living in those communities.”
The reason for this correlation is clear: strict Islamic Sharia commands jihad (“terrorism”) against unbelievers just as it commands Muslim women to don the hijab. Where one proliferates—evincing adherence to Sharia—so too will the other naturally follow.
But Russia’s growing list of Islamic books to be banned on the charge that they incite terrorism is perhaps more significant. Elaph continues: “This move [ban on the hijab] coincides with a growing number of religious books to be prohibited, with dozens of them being placed on the terrorist list, including Sahih Bukhari and numerous booklets containing verses from the Koran and sayings of the prophet.”
According to Apastovsk district RT prosecutors, Sahih Bukhari is being targeted because it promotes “exclusivity of one of the world’s religions,” namely Islam, or, in the words of a senior assistant to the prosecutor of Tatarstan Ruslan Galliev, it promotes “a militant Islam” which “arouses ethnic, religious enmity.”
This is significant. While one may expect modern day books and tracts written by the likes of al-Qaeda or the Islamic State to be banned, Sahih Bukhari, compiled in the 9th century, is fundamental to Sunni Islam (that is, 90 percent of the world’s Muslims). Indeed, the nine-volume book is often seen as second in importance only to the Koran itself and contains the most authentic sayings attributed to the Muslim prophet Muhammad.
And yet, that this important scripture promotes “exclusivity”—that is, supremacism—and “arouses ethnic, religious enmity”—that is, “terrorism”—should not be missed on anyone. The following few statements contained in Sahih Bukhari and attributed to the prophet of Islam speak for themselves. Muhammad said:
•“I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings [tawriya, Islamic deception], and I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy).”
•“Whoever changed his Islamic religion [“apostates”], then kill him.”
•In the end times, a “stone will say, ‘O Muslim! There is a Jew behind me; kill him!’”
•“I have been ordered (by Allah) to fight against the people until they testify that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that Muhammad is Allah’s Apostle, and offer the prayers perfectly and give the obligatory charity” [i.e., until they become observant Muslims].”
Apparently the Russians are aware that such assertions—whether they come from this or that jihadi or from Prophet Muhammad—are enough to incite chaos on their soil. Indeed, the “terrorist” writings of modern day Islamic jihad groups are all infused with and based on the intolerant texts found in Islamic scriptures such as Sahih Bukhari.
This begs the following question: what of the Koran? Can it too be banned on the same grounds? After all, Islam’s number one holy book is also replete with calls to violence and terrorism against unbelievers. Koran 8:12 is one of numerous examples: Allah declares “I will cast terror into the hearts of the unbelievers, so strike [them] upon the necks,” that is, behead them, as the Islamic State has been doing—while citing the Koran.
At any rate, back in La La Land, far from banning Islamic texts that incite violence and terrorism, Barack Hussein Obama has banned U.S. intelligence communities from connecting anything Islamic to Islamic terrorism. In other words, Muslims are free to be incited by Islam’s scriptures—prompting things like beheadings and hatchet jihad attacks in America. The only ban rests on those who dare connect such acts to the core texts of Islam that so clearly inspire them.
Hello there…..its me again……..Don Laird…….
@Russians ban Islam……
Let us support Russia, let us emulate Russia…….
We can no longer tolerate these mosques and their “congregations’. They are little more than political beachheads whose role is the planning and execution of activities that are designed for the sole purpose of either enslaving all non-Muslims or wiping the same from the face of the earth.
We must face reality and begin to deal with this threat, with the Muslim and its Islam, in an effective and expeditious manner, by providing solutions and actions that speak of an unmistakable sense of permanence and finality, . We can no longer suffer the cultivation of cancerous barbarism, savagery and the poisonous lunacy of a 7th mass murdering, psychopathic pedophile amongst citizens in a civilized society.
So, let us begin.
Every mosque that has even the slightest hint of radicalism or connection to terrorism in any way shape or form should be subject to, after expedient quasi-judicial tribunal adjudication, immediate state sponsored deconstruction that leaves only rubble and ashes. The property the mosque occupied, once the smoke clears and is once again cool to the touch, would be auctioned off to the highest bidder with the revenue from the sale being put into non-Muslim victims funds and the further funding of the logistical, administrative and operational requirements of the MAID internment/incarceration/deportation facilities.
(M.A.I.D. MUSLIM ARREST INTERNMENT/INCARCERATION DEPORTATION)
All persons associated with membership in the aforementioned mosques, either directly or indirectly, would be immediately arrested.
Search warrants would be immediately issued and all businesses, residences, property in any form at any location and all telecommunications and internet accounts of arrestees and their associates/relatives would be seized and searched.
These same persons would face an expedited trial in front of the same quasi-judicial tribunal. Upon conviction, guilt by association being the lowest threshold to be met in determining guilt, with no availability of appeal, these persons would be interned.
During their internment, while awaiting deportation, the assets of the arrestees would be liquidated and or auctioned off to the highest bidder with the revenue from the sale being put into non-Muslim victims funds and the further funding of the logistical, administrative and operational requirements of the MAID internment/incarceration/deportation facilities.
Prior to deportation all deportees/arrestees will be thoroughly identified with DNA, retina scan, voice print and complete biometric identification.
The deportees, not having the protections of the Geneva Convention, would understand that once deported, any attempt to return to Canada or the non-Muslim country would be considered an act of war and would be dealt with accordingly.
Understanding that the Muslim that moves amongst us is fully supported by self loathing, politically correct Leftist/Liberals whose actions are a mirror image of the Vichy collaborators, whose actions are the very definition of subversion, treachery, sedition and treason, and as such must be dealt with in the same manner as the Muslim and its Islam.
This said one must look at the Muslim for what it is and does. One can no more beat a pig for rolling in mud, nor a dog for howling at the moon, than one can beat a Muslim for seeking our enslavement or annihilation; this love of lunacy and murder defines the Muslim, it’s what they live for, it is who they are. So deal with them for what they do naturally.
This potential for a modicum of compassion in dealing with the Muslim cannot be accorded those who walk amongst us and quietly and no so quietly ally themselves with the Muslim. These treasonous men and women must be dealt with harshly as they know better, and yet in spite of that knowledge seek to harm their own people, culture and country.
These traitors can be found in the judiciary, the legal industry, the academia, all levels of political office, the media and the intelligence/military and law enforcement infrastructure. Currently these persons are being identified with exacting particularity.
In closing, consider our country without the vulgar barbarism of the Muslim and its Islam, consider our country without the treasonous Leftist/Liberals who lick the boots and do the bidding of their Muslim masters………..it would once again, be a peaceful country, a civilized country, a country without threat.
While you think about this think about the actions of the Muslim, think about the actions of the police who protect the Muslim, think about the lawyers who provide passionate avocation of Muslim murder, think about the politicians who rise in Parliament to sing the praises of Muslim murderers, think about our soldiers slaughtered in our nations capital to the uproarious laughter of the Muslim, think about the Mainstream Media who smear censorship across the treason and madness of the Muslim and its handmaidens, think of the tenured academia who instill in our children a seething hatred of their own people, country and culture……….and then, while you think of that, all of that, think of these definitions, these sections of the Canadian Criminal Code and a quote from a Roman senator and philosopher.
DEFINITIONS
Treason; noun, the crime of betraying one’s country, especially by attempting to kill the sovereign or overthrow the government.
Treachery; noun, betrayal of trust; deceptive action or nature.
Sedition; noun, conduct or speech inciting people to rebel against the authority of a state or monarch.
Collaborator; noun, a person who cooperates traitorously with an enemy; a defector.
Traitor; noun, a person who betrays a friend, country, principle.
Fifth Columnist; noun, A fifth column is any group of people who undermine a larger group,such as a nation or a besieged city, from within. The activities of a fifth column can be overt or clandestine. Forces gathered in secret can mobilize openly to assist an external attack. This term is also extended to organized actions by military personnel. Clandestine fifth column activities can involve acts of sabotage, disinformation, or espionage executed within defense lines by secret sympathizers with an external force.
CANADIAN CRIMINAL CODE
46. (1) Every one commits high treason who, in Canada,
(a) kills or attempts to kill Her Majesty, or does her any bodily harm tending to death or destruction, maims or wounds her, or imprisons or restrains her;
(b) levies war against Canada or does any act preparatory thereto; or
(c) assists an enemy at war with Canada, or any armed forces against whom Canadian Forces are engaged in hostilities, whether or not a state of war exists between Canada and the country whose forces they are.
Marginal note:Treason
(2) Every one commits treason who, in Canada,
(a) uses force or violence for the purpose of overthrowing the government of Canada or a province;
(b) without lawful authority, communicates or makes available to an agent of a state other than Canada, military or scientific information or any sketch, plan, model, article, note or document of a military or scientific character that he knows or ought to know may be used by that state for a purpose prejudicial to the safety or defence of Canada;
(c) conspires with any person to commit high treason or to do anything mentioned in paragraph (a);
(d) forms an intention to do anything that is high treason or that is mentioned in paragraph (a) and manifests that intention by an overt act; or
(e) conspires with any person to do anything mentioned in paragraph (b) or forms an intention to do anything mentioned in paragraph (b) and manifests that intention by an overt act.
A QUOTE FROM A ROMAN………
“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.”
-The Traitor, Marcus Tillius Cicero
Now, consider all of the above, consider what you will sell, what you will turn your back on, what was placed in your care to be guarded with vigilance and jealousy, what you will defend and the lengths to which you will go to defend the same.
Draw your line in the sand, decide upon a course of action to be taken should that line be crossed and then act.
It has been a long while since citizens have had to bleed alongside those young men they send into battle, a long time since we have had to bleed for something of worth………perhaps the time has come to bleed once more.
The time has come, is long overdue, to remove from our midst that which hates us and seeks, at every opportunity, our demise. The time has come to send the Muslim home.
Food for thought, a catalyst for action.
Regards, Don Laird
Dogtown Bastard
Alberta, Canada
As an after thought, I’d like you to meet a few young French patriots who looked around at the Muslim as it shrieks, as it demands, as it distracts, as it divides as it destroys, at the same smearing the filth and excrement of its Islam on all they held dear, on all their parents refused to defend………outraged and filled with resolve, they drew a line in the sand.
We can learn much from them, or not, the choice is yours.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYJB-wjrGsM
Hello from Russia.
I’d like to clear up something. Hijab hasn’t been banned in Russia per se. It was banned in schools and probably (I’m not sure) in some Universities. Couple of years ago there was a scandal at one school when a director demanded a few Muslim girls to stop wearing headscarves at class, but they refused. This ended up in a new state law about obligatory school uniform which obviously doesn’t include a headscarf. That’s all. Outside schools and some other specific institutions women are free to cover their head as much as they want. Moreover, non-Muslim women are often wear headscarves in cold seasons as head-dresses, so there is no way it can be banned.
About women being “harassed” for wearing hijab. I don’t have any personal experience with that, but recently I read an article by one journalist (a girl) who decided to check it by herself what is it like to wear hijab in Moscow. She’s been wearing it for a week and said the worst thing that happened to her were a few leers. The article (in Russian): http://www.the-village.ru/village/city/experience/167975-zhenschina-v-hidzhabe-eskperiment