When Muhammad returned from Badr to Medina in triumph, he proceeded to
settle old scores with his detractors. An atmosphere of fear and
foreboding descended on the city. His first victim was Asma
bint Marwan, a poetess who had mocked him in verse; she was slain
while nursing her baby, and the surviving members of her family
“willingly” accepted Islam the following morning. Abu Afak, an elderly
Jew who dared question
Muhammad’s methods, was the next victim of Muhammad’s hit squads,
immediately followed by yet another unfriendly poet, Kab
bin al-Ashraf. Artistic expression and freedom
of speech were thus given a distinctly Islamic interpretation by the religion’s
founder himself.
In the morning after Ashraf—a Jew—was killed, Muhammad told
his followers to “kill any Jew you can lay your hands on.” One
Muhayyisa bin Mas’ud, to prove his devotion, killed Jewish merchant Ibn
Sunayna, his ex-employer. When six of Muhammad’s henchmen murdered
an elderly Jew by the name of Abu Rafi in his sleep, they argued whose
weapon had actually ended the victim’s life. The prophet decided that
the owner of the sword that still had traces of food on it was entitled to
the credit: Abu Rafi had just eaten his dinner before falling asleep, and
the fatal slash went through his stomach.
Muhammad’s attack against the Jewish tribe of Banu-’l-Mustaliq was
the next step towards his Endloesung. His followers slaughtered many
tribesmen, looted thousands of their camels and sheep; and kidnapped 500
of their women. The night after the battle, Muhammad and his brigands staged
an orgy of rape.
In Mecca Muhammad had hoped to be accepted as God’s messenger by the
Jews, but he underestimated their allegiance to their scriptures. His
superficial, second-hand knowledge of the Bible made it impossible for him
to argue on par with the learned merchants of Medina steeped in their
Tradition. The result of their unsurprising refusal to give it up in favor
of the claims of a poorly educated refugee was that Muhammad’s earlier, favorable
pronouncements about the Jews evolved into a harshly hostile position.
The result is summarized in a chillingly euphemistic account
by a Muslim scholar: “the final result of the struggle was the
disappearance of these Jewish communities from Arabia proper.”
This “disappearance” was not a spontaneous phenomenon but the
result of ethnic cleansing and genocide, culminating in the attack the
last surviving Jewish tribe in Medina, Banu
Qurayzah. Accused of treachery and forced to surrender, some 600 and
perhaps up to 900 men were decapitated in front of their women and
children. “Truly the judgment of Allah was pronounced on high,” Muhammad
gloated, and Allah responded by praising him for the way “he struck
terror into their hearts.” (33:25) The women were subsequently raped, of
course; Muhammad chose as his concubine one Raihana Bint Amr, whose father
and husband were both slaughtered before her eyes some hours earlier. Such
treatment of captive women had already been sanctioned by prophetic
revelation, and applied to the captive women of Banu-’l-Mustaliq.
Around that time Allah’s messages concerning “the infidel” grew
ever harsher: “Take him and fetter him and expose him to hell fire.”
(69:30-37) Others “will be killed or crucified, or have their hands and
feet on alternate sides cut off.” (5:33-34) In this world for the
captured infidel “We have prepared chains, yokes and a blazing fire.”
(76:4) In the hereafter things get even worse: “garments of fire will be
cut out for them, boiling fluid will be poured down their heads. Whereby
that which is in their bellies, and their skins too, will be melted . . .
And for them are hooked rods of iron.” (22:19-22) One single Kuranic
verse, “the Verse of the Sword,” (9:5) Islamic scholars agree, abrogates
124 earlier verses—the ones that are quoted most regularly by
Islam’s character witnesses and apologists to prove its alleged
tolerance and benevolence.
The image of a victorious leader, merciless with the defeated infidel
and feared by his foes, worked wonders for Muhammad. On January 12, 630,
he marched into Mecca in triumph, having
violated the ten-year truce of Hudaybiyya signed two years previously.
That violation was predictably condoned by Allah. (60:10) Ever since, the
view of Islamic jurists has been that truces with the infidel could only
be temporary and that their only permissible objective was to enable the
Muslim side to gain strength for a new onslaught.
Muhammad’s progression from a marginalized outsider to a master of
life and death produced a transformation of his personality in the decade
preceding his death in 633 AD. Allah was invoked as the authority
supporting the prophet’s daily political objectives and his personal
needs. Nowhere was this more obvious than when it came to his exaggerated
sensuality.
Contrary to his own regulations he had at least fifteen wives. The
youngest was Aisha,
a daughter of his close aide and the first caliph Abu Bakr, who was seven
years old “and with the dolls” when Muhammad—44 years her
senior—“married” her. Two years later, when she was 9 and he 53, the
“prophet” consummated the “marriage,” i.e. raped the little girl.
Some years later he came up with a Kuranic verse approving his nightly
trysts with an Egyptian slave girl, and admonishing his jealous wives for
their objections to the practice. (66:1-3) Allah’s revelation also
enabled Muhammad to take his daughter-in-law Zainab as a wife when he
lusted after her. (36:37)
Many commands of the Kuran and Muhammad’s actions and words recorded
in the Traditions are morally abhorrent and/or criminal by the standards
of our time. But even in the context of 7th century Arabia they were often
considered repugnant. Muhammad had to resort to “revelations” as a
means of justifying his actions and suppressing the prevalent moral code
of his own society. Attacking caravans in the holy month, taking up arms
against one’s kinsmen, slaughtering prisoners, reserving a lion’s
share of the booty, murdering people without provocation, violating
treaties, and indulging one’s sensual passions, was also at odds with
the moral standards of his Arab contemporaries. Only the ultimate
authority could sanction it, and Allah duly obliged him.
Muhammad’s practice and constant encouragement of bloodshed are
unique in the history of religions. Murder, pillage, rape, and more murder
have “impressed his followers with a profound belief in the value of
bloodshed as opening the gates of Paradise” (cf. Margoulith
1914) and prompted countless Muslim governors, caliphs, and viziers,
to refer to Muhammad’s example to justify their treatment of the
infidels. Allah’s order to “kill the unbelievers wherever you find
them” is an injunction both unambiguous and powerful. The word
“genocide” was not even coined when Muhammad conveyed Allah’s
alleged dictum, “When we decide to destroy a population . . . then we
destroy them utterly.” (17:16-17) Disobedient people “we utterly
destroyed.” (21:11)