Despite the horrifying numbers of black Africans,
whether in
Darfur
or the Christian south, killed by Sudanese Arab Muslims, Islamic
governments worldwide have ignored these atrocities committed by their
co-religionists. The West has made its usual pathetic gestures of outrage.
The African Union for its part, although most of its member states are
black, cannot seem to find the courage to confront
Sudan
for its anti-black racism. It is also revealing that in the
United States
, the Nation of Islam, a black nationalist organization, led by the vocal
Louis Farrakhan, has said nothing. Farrakhan, a Koran-clutching champion
of black causes appears willing to overlook the murder of black Africans
in order not to offend his fellow Muslim. Perhaps religious solidarity
trumps racial violence. It certainly seems that in the Islamic mind while
cartoons of Mohammad, drawn by an obscure Dane, are worth killing over,
the death of hundreds of thousands of blacks in
Sudan
at the hands of Arab Muslims is not even worth a mention let alone a
protest. What is more obscene – thousands of murdered black Africans or
cartoons of Mohammad? Where was the moral outrage from Muslim governments
who so successfully turn every criticism into a perceived attack on Islam?
Where is the anger over
Sudan
from Muslims who normally go into paroxysms of self-righteous rage at the
very mention of an entity called
Israel
? Is it Muslims or their very faith that allows no pity for the lives of
powerless black "infidels"? However, the Muslim world is not
alone in this moral vacuum. As far as the West is concerned, perhaps the
hope of future oil deals with
Sudan
dampened western desire to stop the
Darfur
killings. Given the West's silence over the Rwandan genocide in the
mid-1990s, perhaps the lives of black Africans, with no oil or
geo-political importance to barter with, really are just not worth the
effort.
Saudi Arabia
(formerly known as
Arabia
, before the Saud family took ownership and modestly renamed it) is the
historic, cultural and religious center of Islam. The Saudi ruling elite,
in partnership with the hardline Wahhabi religious establishment, see
themselves as the guardians, and indeed exporters, of Sunni Islam.
Consequently, there is little room in
Arabia
for the rights of religious minorities, most of whom are guest workers
working in low paid menial jobs.
Saudi Arabia
is in fact a fully fledged religious apartheid system. Non-Muslims simply
have no right to worship freely, build temples or churches, testify
against a Muslim, hold political office or in fact hold any authority over
Muslims. At all times, the non-Muslim is expected to know his place and
act with subservience and deference towards Muslims. Islamic law denies
non-Muslims the most basic aspect of humanity, love itself. A non-Muslim
man must not make the mistake of falling in love with a Muslim woman,
since Islam forbids such a union. However, Islamic law does allow, and in
fact encourages, Muslim men to marry non-Muslim women (provided they
convert to Islam), thereby strengthening Islam demographically. The reason
for the inferior status of non-Muslims is very simple – the Koran and
Islamic law are regarded as divine and demand power for Islam and power
demands religious apartheid. In turn Saudi rulers, as self-appointed
guardians of Islam, enforce these
Nuremberg
style laws. Their very power depends on this. No matter how skillfully
apologists and favored Islamic scholars in the west, such as John Esposito
and Karen Armstrong, explain Islam, these facts that cannot be silenced.
Whereas the racial apartheid of
South Africa
was universally condemned, there is almost no mention of
Saudi Arabia
's religious apartheid. The reasons, in part, are based on economics, oil
and the sale of arms by western governments. However, there is also the
self-censorship, based on intellectual dishonesty and moral cowardice of
western intellectuals, in criticizing Islamic law. Western liberals and
feminists reserve their anger for issues such as the Saudi ban on females
driving cars – as if this is the apex of human suffering – yet these
same humane liberals are oblivious to Saudi Arabia's apartheid imposed on
millions of non-Muslim guest workers who toil in insecurity and fear (it
must be noted that the Wahhabist Sunni establishment also discriminates
against the small Shia minority). Along with western silence, there is no
outrage or condemnation from Muslims at
Saudi Arabia
's treatment of its religious minorities. While the Palestinian issue, the
French head scarf ban or the cartoons of Mohammad are regarded as attacks
on Islam by Muslims, there is almost complete amnesia when it comes to
those victimized by Islam. The question of what is more hurtful to human
dignity, religious apartheid or a few cartoons of Mohammad, needs to be
asked by Muslims non-Muslims alike.
Imagine if the sheer energy expended over protesting
the Mohammad cartoons, was directed by Muslims at fighting for equal
political rights for women and non-Muslims. Imagine 100,000 Muslims
protesting in
Karachi
,
Tehran
and
Riyadh
, demanding that the Saudi religious apartheid system be dismantled.
Imagine courageous Muslim lawyers litigating those parts of Islamic law,
that call for the subjugation of non-Muslims, as hate doctrine. Would
Islamists anywhere then stand a chance of dividing Muslim from Non-Muslim?
<
back |