Printer-friendly version
Send to friend
PDF versionEdmund Pickett
Muhammad was the kindest man who ever lived, according to Muslims. He was filled with love and compassion for all living things. In fact, he was the only perfect human being who ever lived, according to Muslims. If you want to lead a perfect life, you just have to look at Muhammad and do what he did.
I’m no Muslim, but I’ve always yearned to be perfect, so I decided to get myself some sex slaves. Muhammad had several, in addition to ten or a dozen wives. This is all legal according to God’s laws, given in the Koran, and God’s laws don’t change. What was legal 1400 years ago is legal today.
There has been a polite tradition in English of referring to these sex workers by the old-fashioned euphemism “concubines,” but we’re not living in the Victorian era, so let’s use plain English. They were slaves and their job was to provide sex. By the way, those dark-eyed virgins waiting for Muslim martyrs in paradise are also sex slaves. If they were only there to serve heavenly tea and cookies they wouldn’t have to be virgins, right?
I’m still wondering about certain practical problems of acquiring my slaves, since Islamic law is not recognized in the United States, but I decided to start researching Islamic sources on the subject, so I’ll know how to handle my women when I do get them. In particular I want to know the
kind way to deal with sex slaves. The Koran doesn’t have a lot of detailed slave management advice, but that’s not really a problem. There are thousands of traditional stories about the prophet’s daily life and sayings known as hadith, collected after his death by people who knew him. There are six main collections of hadith considered reliable by Muslims and these books have authority equal to the Koran. I found just what I needed in the collection known as Sahih Bukhari, in volumes I, IV and V.
After the Battle of Khaybar one of Muhammad’s soldiers named Dihya asked the Prophet if he could choose one of the captive women. Muhammad told him to take his pick, but not long afterwards some other soldiers told Muhammad that Dihya had snagged the hottest babe they had ever seen. The Messenger of Allah immediately ordered the couple to be brought to him. After one look at the slave, named Safiyya, Muhammed told Dihya to choose someone else. Safiyyah was not only gorgeous, she was high-class, the daughter of the chief of the tribe that had just been defeated. Bukhari adds that Safiyyah’s father and all the other men of her tribe had been killed. This means that those who didn’t die in battle were murdered as prisoners. Bukhari also notes that Safiyyah’s husband, Kinana, had just been tortured before being killed. You might be wondering at this point, as I was, how Muhammad (a.k.a. The Soul of Kindness & Compassion) would treat this unfortunate woman.
Wasting few words, Bukhari continues, “Muhammad immediately freed her and married her himself—since she agreed to convert to Islam, she was able to be elevated beyond the portion of a slave. That night Safiyyah was dressed as a bride and a wedding feast was hastily arranged. On the way out of Khaybar that night, Muhammad halted his caravan as soon as they were outside the oasis, pitched a tent and consummated the marriage.”
At this point I began to wonder if I have what it takes to own slaves in the authentically
kind Islamic manner. The first un-Islamic thought that occurred to me is that Safiyyah might have preferred a longer engagement. Maybe she would have preferred a little time to mourn her father and her husband, a day or two to adjust to the fact that every adult man in her tribe had just been butchered. The dead would have included her brothers, cousins, nephews, every male above the age of say, fifteen. And perhaps Safiyyah could have used a little time to mourn for her mother, her sisters and all the children of the tribe, who were headed to the nearest slave market. I wondered also if the women and children were forced to watch the murder of their menfolk, but due to his extraordinary
kindness I’m sure that Muhammad would have allowed them to look in the other direction. But then, screams carry a long way. When I think about that wedding feast, which Bukhari tells us was “hastily arranged,” I figure that Safiyyah probably noticed that all the guests were from the groom’s side.
But Muhammad’s unbelievable
kindness really shines out in this story. After all, he freed her, gave her one thousand gold pieces and an escort of soldiers to take her wherever she wanted to go. She moved to Cairo, well outside Muslim control, and observed the one year period of mourning required by Jewish law. Then Muhammad sent her so many beautiful letters describing his great love for her that she returned to Mecca and married him.
Except I guess I made most of that up. In my version, though, she would have been really free, as in free to leave the man who had erased her tribe, free to accept or reject his proposal of marriage, free to decide if she wanted to bow down to him as the Anointed of God. In Bukhari’s version though, which is unimpeachable truth for Muslims, Safiyyah had a choice of (A.) remaining Jewish, in which case she would still be a sex slave, with the same status as Mary, another sex slave who was Christian, or choice (B.) she could convert and become a “wife” of Muhammad. Saying that Muhammad had set her free is absurd. She was a woman with nothing but the clothes she was wearing, she had no money, no food, no family, no one to protect her and she was surrounded by ten thousand soldiers who knew that God wanted them to kill Jews like her. If Muhammad had truly freed her, in the sense of cutting her loose and then forgetting about her, she would have starved to death or become the slave of some other soldier.
She was never offered freedom and she knew it, from the moment she and Dihya were ushered into the Prophet’s presence. When Muhammad looked her up and down and told Dihya to go pick himself another slave, Safiyyah knew that her future would be providing sexual services to Muhammad. She knew she was going to spend the rest of her life being raped by a man more than thirty years older than she was and that she would have to pretend to enjoy it. She could submit to him as a slave or as a quote, wife, unquote. I imagine that she chose “wife” in the hope that her higher status would allow her to help some of her people, who now had the status of livestock. Perhaps she thought she could convince Allah’s Messenger to choose her mother for a slave also, allowing them to remain together. However, if the Kindest Man Who Ever Lived showed any compassion to his new wife’s family, none of the books of canonical hadith mention it.
Bukhari does however conclude his tale with the truly romantic story of Muhammad pitching a fast tent on the edge of the oasis to sample the charms of his new bride A.S.A.P. Some people might find this a bit abrupt, but Muhammad had needs. Powerful needs. As he explained himself, in another hadith (Ibn Ishaq, 459) “(The Angel) Gabriel brought a kettle from which I ate and I was given the power of sexual intercourse equal to forty men.” In other words, it is Allah’s fault that The Soul Of Compassion was so horny he couldn’t wait to get Safiyyah into the tent.
From our wimpy 21
st century viewpoint it might not be pleasant to contemplate that particular sex act, but I think we should try to imagine Safiyyah’s options when she found herself alone in that tent with the butcher of her people, who for some twisted hypocritical reason wanted to think of himself as her “husband.” Resistance would have meant death. She could have merely submitted. She could have let Allah’s Anointed do what he had come to do and hope it was quick…
But she was a woman of high status. Bukhari says that she was “the chief-mistress of the ladies of the tribes of Qurayzah and An-Nadir.” At that point she was the only high-ranking member of her tribe left and it was therefore her duty to do what she could to help her enslaved relatives. But she was now the newest wife of four, and she would be competing with those other three wives and several sex slaves in trying to gain influence with Muhammad. If she were to have any chance of helping what was left of her people, she would have to do more than
submit to Muhammad, she would have to
thrill him.
Her duty, and I imagine that she understood it, was to make the old murderer fall in love with her.
Sources:
Robert Spencer: The Truth About Muhammad
Sahih Bukhari, vol. I (book 8, #371)
Sahih Bukhari, vol. IV (book 53, #3169) cf. Ibn Sa’d vol.II, 144
Sahih Bukhari, vol. V (book 64, #4242)
See also the Wikipedia entry for Muhammad’s Wives, Safiyyah
Muhammad also had another sex slave named Rihana (or Rihayna), whose story is very similar to that of Safiyyah.
Just wondering what would be
Just wondering what would be the definition of such "acts of kindness" in the 21st century?
--
Kafirs would label such acts of kindness as Rape and hence one of the causes of the schism between the muslims and Kafirs.
No wonder muslims are instructed in the koran to kill the kafirs where ever they find them...
#1 That's the different
#1 That's the different between muslim world (freeze) and normal world (progress).
Yes, Mooo, in a way the Quran
Yes, Mooo, in a way the Quran is "frozen in time". People should develop instead of ONLY following a book meant for all time. Mankind has so much evolved since Muhammads time. He cannot be a PERFECT example any more, part of his teaching MUST be obsolete. Superseded by better, wiser guidance. Even if it was God-given, even then. Maybe many other people with great ideas ALSO were inspired by God?
fyi, mohammad has acromegaly
fyi, mohammad has acromegaly Individuals suffering from this has increased libido(sexual urge). That explains his 13 wives including that 9 y/o child he married when he was already 54. Imagine that?
Isn't that interesting!
Isn't that interesting! Mohammed suffered from a condition that increased his libido. Does that make him less responsible for his actions? Good or bad? Many people suffer from many kinds of afflictions and are still accountable for their actions and do not engage in rape, incest, pedophilia, murder, slavery, or robbery. That does not necessarily give Mohammed a license.
If Allah is god, then by definition, Allah knows everything. Therefore he knew that Mohammed suffered from this condition, and it's probable outcomes: rape, incest, pedophilia... If this is the case then Allah is making the actions and conditions of Mohammed normative since the behaviour of Mohammed is supposed to be the example for all to follow. Allah therefore knew beforehand what Mohammed was going to do, and by choosing Mohammed, allowed his actions and sanctified them. Since Allah is god, and by definition, knows everything sanctioned Mohammed's actions and therefore sanctioned rape, incest, and pedophilia.
Since rape, incest, and pedophilia are clearly immoral acts then it's not much of a step to sanctioning slavery, robbery, murder, etc since they are also clearly immoral acts. And since THOSE clearly immoral acts are sanctioned by Allah then Allah must have known beforehand that Mohammed would engage in such actions. Allah calls himself the 'beneficent' and 'merciful' and since clearly rape, incest, pedophilia, slavery, robbery, murder, etc. are clearly not beneficent nor merciful and they are sanctioned by Allah, then clearly Allah is neither beneficent nor merciful then clearly he is disqualified as a god.
Remember though that Allah describes himself as the "best of liars'. In Western Civilization we have a term for the 'best of liars' and that is the 'Prince of Liars': which is a pseudonym for Satan.
Therefore the only conclusion that can be logically reached is one of two things: 1) that Allah does not exist and is only a figment and feature of Mohammed and the evil done by Islam lies ultimately at the feet of Mohammed and his followers.
2) if such creatures exist then Allah can only be Satan and Mohammed is his spokesman.
Demsci wrote: Yes, Mooo, in
Demsci wrote:
Yes, Mooo, in a way the Quran is “frozen in time”. People should develop instead of ONLY following a book meant for all time. Mankind has so much evolved since Muhammads time. He cannot be a PERFECT example any more, part of his teaching MUST be obsolete. Superseded by better, wiser guidance. Even if it was God-given, even then. Maybe many other people with great ideas ALSO were inspired by God?
Any religious text should not prohibit humanity from developing.
#6 Dearborn muslims are
#6 Dearborn muslims are trying to stop free speech. Jihad watch shows it and bare naked islam
Dear scumbag moslems If
Dear scumbag moslems
If mohammad pedophile rapist can have sex slaves and right hand possessions, I do not see any thing wrong at all in having it off with a fe wmuslimahs after liquidating moslems! It is the command of the halla and his rasool PK is only following the orders of halla.
Halla wants you to bray 15 times a day and moslimah does not desanctify the prayer ,unless she is not naked.
Passing moslem, pig and pseudo secular people defile the brayers.
to Mr proudkafir #8 Go easy
to Mr proudkafir #8
Go easy there pal. There is no need to express your anger unnecessarily. I think it's unfair to have you vituperating insults and abusive remarks here without checking on you. FFI did warned some of the posters except you. I dont know what specialty you possess pal.
My appeal to you is that, can you post some persuasive post? I know you have extensive knowledge there that worth sharing. Can you?
Humanity is but one family. :)
# 9 Simple reply would be
# 9
Simple reply would be done!
Angry words? Hmm I think not. The moslems posted abusive messages against me and I just replied and mind you I have not used abusive words except "scum bag"
One of the gifts/talents of using the words is use them effectively to elicit a predictable response from the readers.So many millions visit the site and read the articles and messages.Why do people have to take offense to only what I post? Why should the moderators ban me when I to a large extent do not use vulgar or abusive words?
I know I can be scathing but not abusive
Muhammad was a perfect being
Muhammad was a perfect being :A PERFECT AxxHOLE.Let us not take away his perfection from him.The followers of the perfect religion follow their perfect example and try to be as perfect him.
Generalising
Generalising slightly:
Mohammed's actions towards women explain a lot about the actions/reactions of (at least certain sections) of the male Umma, do they not.
This story reminds me (in a general way) of the story of Esther in the Bible.
She is another Jewess sacrificing herself for the good of her people. She was luckier though - Esther managed to stop the massacre of the Jews, poor Saffiyah had already witnessed that and was trying to salvage what she could.
Sad how history repeats itself. Sad how anti-semitism is so rife in Islam today.
emm. amazing )
emm. amazing )