Skip to Content

Jewels From Brigitte Gabriel II: Because They Hate (Video)

Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly versionSend to friendSend to friendPDF versionPDF versionMuslims in America Regarding Iran Have the Brits gone mad? Barbaric Islam Preaching Hate
0
Your rating: None

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I do not see any thing useful

I do not see any thing useful coming outta this video.The chief of staff US of A is exposing his arse to king of sodi barbaria.Islam will soon rule the world and we can all be inshallah happy like the afghanis do.
We can all be happy banging our daughters and as many women as we like. If india andUS fall to islam there is no prevention.US has gone half way.Its only question of time satan is waiting in the sid eline to tke over.


Great women like Brigitte are

Great women like Brigitte are a rare gem, Islam needs this kind of exposure, the truth about Islam is being known steadily these days, what remains now is action from the European and the American governments, but America is a long shot now considering the nature of its presidency.


The soft speaking face and

The soft speaking face and mouthpiece of terror on the O'Reilly clip is part of the islamic propaganda offensive. Gabriel identifies correctly that islam abuses democratic freedoms to advance their undemocratic agendas. That is an old totalitarian game that goes back to Hitler.

What this is a good example of is that the islamic machine not only uses the politics of liberty against liberty itself but it also uses the MORALITY of liberty against liberty.

The first thing that comes out of the mouth of the black muslim - (Notice the strategic use of a black man which provides further 'oppressed' undertones) are the plattitudes of moral pluralism. When is a stereotype legitimate? Never when it properly identifies muslim beliefs and behaviours.

The abuse of process by islamic propaganda is to return the charge of 'stereotype' as a rebuttal when the majority of muslims in Sudan call for murder. But a majority of Sudanese muslims is not a muslim majority they say because muslims in say America don't (i.e. can't yet) act that way, so a false charge of prejudice is levied.

It is all smoke and mirrors designed to psychologically undermine resistance. The first fallacy is that stereotypes are not always false and are useful in indicating traits empirically induced. Just because a stereotype is used does not make it automatically false.

The abuse and use of Western morality as a device to inflict psychological paralysis will not save the arabs. Maybe America is hynotised by this gibberish but the Jews will not be fooled by such ridiculous self-serving homilies. The process will be observed in England. Pluralism, tolerance, muti-culturalism blah blah blah until one day when there are 10 million muslims in England then the raping, pillaging, sharia and usual denouement.

You see it is islam that demands tolerance for itself but does not give it to anything else. When the time comes for reciprocity islam further twists the knife by saying 'tolerance? that is against our religion!' The world provides sanctuary for islamic anti-Semitism on the basis of religious freedom.

Two can play that game. And that game is coming to Israel. Jewish values? Look in Ezekiel!! There find the Jewish values which will be resurrected in the service of God's covenant. The intellectual machinery does not exist to paralyse the Jewish mind least of all this lame islamic propaganda borrowed from bankrupt Western liberalism.

Like everything else islam can only corrupt something created outside itself. It is incapable of producing anything itself - even the paradigm of its own defense is the corruption of borrowed concepts which are otherwise an anathema to it.


We need burkha burners just

We need burkha burners just like the bra burners! The difficulty is the muslimahs do not wear any thing under the burkhas and what will they do if they burn their burkhas? seriously consider this.We need an educated muslimahs who can be independent and can kick the butts of the likes of bhattis, amims, etc


The Muslim`s book the "Koran"

The Muslim`s book the "Koran" expresses with brutal openness the need for a muslim to kill the non-muslim host communities. After all, this book from Allah firmly convinces him that he would one day be lord of his host people, and that he could then impose his law Sharia on them. This has already happened in Pakistan, Iran, Afghanistan and host of other peoples.
The hatred of the Muslims for all other religions of the earth spread from this book. The muslim worms his way into a host society through jailbirds and mobs who find tremendous affinity for koranic teachings.

We call destructive elements in nature as parasites. They devour their hosts. The muslim is a perfect parasite. Their tragedy is that, in doing so, they would destroy themselves in the end if allowed to succeed. Nature always helps. When parasites gain the upper hand, they devour each other. That is what we see in muslim parasite: when host is finished, then sunnis kill shias who together kill ahmadiyas and it goes on and on. I was reading somewhere at this site that there are some 70 odd sects and only one is true as per Koran, a perfect recipe for these parasites devouring one another in the end if allowed their way.


Leaving out the Holocaust

Leaving out the Holocaust education in British Schools so they won't offend the Muslims? What about the Jews whose parents and grandparents died in the Holocaust? That's an insult and a disgrace. Muslims should be ashamed of themselves, except they have no shame or empathy. They only know two things: Hatred and killing. They cannot feel for others because they have no empathy or compassion because Islam has robbed them of these emotions. That is why they are offended by the Holocaust because it says the killing of thousands of Jews is an atrocity and Islam states killing Jews is a good thing. Muslims children living in the must abide by our education standards and they don't like our standards then tough. They are living in the west and must abide by our rules and standards or they can be given the option of going back to those Islamic hellholes and be happy.

Speaking of Muslims developing nuclear weapons, Saudi Arabia is trying to get into the sciences.


Brigitte Gabriel is very

Brigitte Gabriel is very impressive, with her knowledge, eloquence, passion and yes, her beauty. It looks like she is so right about the majority of Muslims who stay silent, who seem to sit on the fence. Maybe being loyal to loved ones, to their "Ummah", maybe indoctrinated from childhood and by their newsmedia or imams. I think in the end they have to choose sides, more open than now.

I wonder what would happen if Brigitte went into politics. America has a 2-party-system, but Holland has a multi-party-system. It is possible in Holland to start a new party from scratch, then take part in the elections, and win big-time. Pim Fortuyn did it in 2002. His party got 26 seats in a 150-seats-parliament out from zero. Had he not been shot just before these elections he would have been a high-ranking minister in the government! Now Geert Wilders is doing very well in the polls. We also had Ayaan Hirsi Ali, not as popular, but still voted comfortably into parliament, a few years ago.

I wonder how many votes someone like Brigitte would get in a multi-party-system. Assisted for instance by Wafa Sultan, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Irshad Manji. I am a man, but it seems to me that women have a lot at stake in contemporary world. I heard that the "War on terror"-terminology is put aside by Obama en Hillary. To inspire this fight they now could pronounce it the war FOR total equality of women worldwide. Why would this not be a legitimate goal? Who could be offended by that? Maybe it would wake up and inspire at least more of the women of the world than is now the case. Many of them seem so indifferent, ignorant. Some even defend the oppressors. A large part (but not all) of Islamic women seem to acguiesce in their situation or the situation of their "sisters", even aggravate it, or attact their possible liberators or allies.

Of course there is so much I don't know or understand. But it looks to me like the world is certainly waking up and reacting to this threat to democracy.


Random Articles from All categories