Home

 Articles

 Op-ed

 Authors

 FAQ

 Leaving Islam
 Library
 Gallery
 Comments
 Debates
 Forum

 

 

 

To read Muslims' comments go here

Page 1

  1.  2.  3.  4.  5.  6.  78.  9.  10111213.  141516. 17181920.  21  22  23

 

 

Hi,  

I am a revert to Islam and as you already know I have been having doubts. I have waves of belief and disbelief. I don't really know what  to believe and what not to believe. You make some valid points about  Islam but I am still compelled to believe. You left Islam, when did you  leave it, how old were you, did you have any difficulty?

What are the key points that made you leave. Are there many Muslims leaving Islam. I have to think allot about my belief, but for now I still believe. There have been many Islamic thinkers in the past centuries and for them Islam seemed fine, how come it is not fine for you. I look forward to your reply friend.

 C..

 

Dear C.

You are not “compelled” to believe in anything (Unless you live in an Islamic country, which I suppose you don’t). You have chosen to believe and you can also choose not to believe. Humans are capable to believe in anything and when they do they can kill or die for their faiths. But that does not prove the truth of their beliefs. Faith is human’s most powerful faculty. It must be guided by reason or it will very dangerous.

I realized the falsity of religion in general and Islam in particular only a few years ago. And yes it was very difficult. I went through a range of emotional upheaval, from anger to shame, from confusion to guilt, from desperation to sadness, from bewilderment to void ness. Until I finally accepted that this is not my fault. I am not the one who is guilty. This is all false.

I already explained my reasons for leaving Islam. And yes I am not the only one. Majority of Muslim intellectuals do no more believe in Islam any more. Many of them don’t bother even to talk about it. They just abandon the practice and the belief, without making too much noise. This is understandable since the consequences could be not so pleasing.

You wrote, “There have been many Islamic thinkers in the past centuries and for them Islam seemed fine, how come it is not fine for you.” 

This is the biggest mistake that we people make. We assume that others must know better and blindly follow them. They in turn follow blindly others who have followed blindly yet others before them. We are not sheep. We are given a brain to use it and we are responsible for our own lives.  Not just because something has unanimous acceptance is true. The Earth was never flat even when the entire world, including all our thinkers, philosophers, sears and prophets used to think so. 

Another important point is that most of the great brain of Islam like Ar Razi, Avicenna, Averroes, Khayam, Ibn Arabi and many more were apostates and constantly harassed and persecuted.

Thank you for writing.

Ali Sina

 


 

Dear Ali,  

Thank you for writing me that email. Those Quran and Hadeeth references shocked me. How could a religion promote injust behaviour like that. What you wrote made me think, I really have to think about my belief in Islam and whether I want to continue. I am quite conflicted as I like to think that I live according to humanistic values like democracy, freedom of thought and equal justice for all people,  but these are obviously in conflict with Islamic values. How would society look if we lived according to these hadeeths? It would definetly be oppressive. But these hadeeths that you have put forward, what can an Imam say to counter them, he can say nothing, then why is Islam the fastest growing religion in the world, how can people continue to be Muslims when this is what they are told to do? It is shocking. I will think alot, I live in a western country where I am as you say not compelled to believe anything,

I do not have to be a Muslim if I don't want to. Do you believe in God, do you follow any other religion? I look forward to your reply with any other comments that you may have.

 Regards,

C.

Dear C. 

Thanks again for the e-mail. You may find Cocooned in Lies and Who Feeds Fundamentalism  answering some of your above questions. To learn about my spiritual belief please have a look at the articles in the section About God 


Hey Ali Sina, why don’t you do some research on how technology can help Iranian people rather than digging old books on who did what to whom a 1000 years back!! Idiots like (you) are so dumb when it comes to up to date topics such as science and technology !

Babak

 

Dear Babak,

It is true; our country is lagging behind industrial and civilized nations in science and technology. But it is my belief that what distracts us is our antiquated doctrines and beliefs. I see Islam as a hurdle to progress and rational thinking. We have to learn first how to walk before we can learn how to run. The Europe was languishing in the claws of religion until they entered a new era of reason, and revolutionized their thought with the renascence of new ideas. It was only then that they penetrated into mysteries of science and invented new technologies. We could keep borrowing their science and technology but if our mind is still shacked in primitive concepts imposed on us by dogmas of our grandfathers we can never assimilate them properly nor be participants in the advancement of the world civilization.

I believe an overall review of our own belief system is essential, if we don’t want to fall prey to the insinuation of other charlatans like we did two decades ago.

Kind regards

Ali Sina


 

Question a)

Why God NEEDS to be known?

BoR 
Answer: Islam does not teach that God "needs" to be known. Here, you erect a strawman in order to take it down.

A. Sina 

If your god Allah does not “need” to be known, why is he so upset when people fail to know him to the extent that he would burn them in his cosmic rotisserie for ETERNITY. (Wow. that is a looooong time!).  If not knowing him would only affect our own spiritual development depriving us from his blessings, etc. it is understandable. But Muhammad was very graphic in depicting a terrible Hell and a vengeful Allah that would “punish”  those who decline to know him. There are many verses that show Allah would send the disbelievers to hell like this one "And as for those who disbelieve and reject Our Signs, they are the people of Hell" Q.5: 11  I don’t think (I need to go over them. One should suffice)

 

Question b)

 If He is so desperate to be known, why he dose not reveal Himself to everyone just the way he revealed Himself to his prophet?

BoR

Answer: From leading question to leading question ... here the strawman erected in "a" is used to question the mode of revelation.

A. Sina

I think Allah’s desperation to be known is quite obvious from every verse of Quran. Otherwise why he threatens people with chastisement? Why he ordered his messenger to go about KILLING the unbelievers? Suppose you invite me to a banquet, if I decline I am the looser. But if you come after me and punish me for not coming to your feast there is something else going on. You must be mentally sick or something. Is Allah a sick god? Why he wants to punish people for not wanting to recognize him?

 

Question c)

Why he plays hide and seek and then punishes those who fail to recognize him?

BoR
Answer: Having built up his strawman in "a" and "b", our highly pseudointellectual Mr. afreethinker now assumes that He - Allah SWT - "plays" hide and seek. That is not a belief of Islam, either.

A. Sina

The question in “a” and “b” were not answered. But this is a separate question. You cannot deny that Allah wants to be known. According to Islam he has created the whole universe so that people “know him and worship him”. This is the purpose of creation, according to Islam.  "I did not create Jinn and Men except that they may worship me" [Qur'an 51:56].   

Allah wants to be known and worshiped. That is established throughout the Quran. He is so offended that people worship other deities save him that he would order his messenger fight and kill them and in the after life he would roast them in Hell for ever. That is the entire and the ONLY message of Quran. My question is why he dose not make himself known to people by revealing himself to them. If he did that to Moses and Muhammad, and they survived why he does not do it for everyone else? This is a simple question and if you had an answer you would not be dodging it.

 

Question d)


Why his messenger acted so ruthlessly and lived such immoral life as to cast doubt on his integrity and truthfulness?

BoR
Answer: This leading question assumes that His Messenger SAW lived an immoral life such as to cast doubt on his integrity and truthfulness. No facts have been adduced to support such a ridiculous proposition. Oh, I'm aware that he's posted all kinds of irrelevant nonsense from Christian websites about supposed wrongdoings, which on careful inspection always turn out to be taken out of context, or outright lies. These all cast doubt on Mr. afreethinker's integrity and truthfulness.

A. Sina

I consider Muhammad's assassinations of his enemies cowardly acts

I also believe that raiding innocent people, killing them for not believing in what you believe is unethical and immoral.

It is also unethical to sleep with a score of women some  not even your wives. (Mariyah)

It is extremely immoral to ask someone to sleep with you on the same day that you killed her father, husband and many of her relatives. (Safiyah)

Which one of these stories are taken "out to the context"? What are  their real contexts?

I think “the facts have been adduced” beyond a shadow of doubt and never denied or rejected. What I posted from Christian sites is not irrelevant. They need to be answered. Just because they are posted in a Christian site they don’t become automatically null and void. Also there are many questions that I have asked in my own website and I am not a Christian. So you either deny the charges against Muhammad or accept them. 

 

Question e)

Why his words in Quran are so contrary to science, logic and common sense?

BoR.
The words of the Qur'an are meant to educate us about HOW TO LIVE. Those who do not follow those words act contrary to science, logic and common sense, as the world wars, the death camps, the cold war, the spread of AIDS, abortion, and so on all silently attest in the mass graves of hundreds of millions of people. And humanism is the cause.

A. Sina

These are mere assertions that any one says about his religion. We need proof. If Quran was from God, it should not have one single error. God is perfect and so should be his word. But since Quran contains thousands of errors of every kind what guarantees you have  that it can actually guide you? Look at the result, the more a country is Islamic the more it is backward and barbaric. “Ye shall recognize them by their fruits”.

 


 

Dr. Bilal Philips (bilalphilips)

“Salaam alaykum, there are so many errors in the article, (Safiyah)it sounds like a Jewish writer with an axe to grind and is full of misinterpretations (deliberate or otherwise). Suffice to say that the waleemah wasn't marriage but the marriage feast held "after" the marriage. So his case for sex before marriage due to excessive lust falls flat on its face. He chooses statements and interprets them as he wills and rejects clarifiying because they don't suite his premise. But all the texts are from the same source. Even his opening salvo about Safiyyah's rejection of the Prophet's advances wasn't mentioned in the text at all but was in the writer's mind as he assumed that she must have rejected them. Etc., etc. It's a typical example of missionary/Jewish anti-Islamic writing, and you can find much more in the libraries, bookstores and the internet.”

Answer

It is said, “The best defense is an offence”. It seems that Muslim apologists have taken this to heart quite literally. Dr. Bilal Philips instead of defending Muhammad for his apparently immoral and unethical behavior in the case of Safiyah accuses me of being a “Jewish writer”. In this way he brushes off the importance of what the prophet of Allah did as if any argument presented by a Jew is automatically worthless.

For Dr. Bilal's information I am not a Jew. Never was and never will be. I was born in an Islamic family and my family tree traces my ancestry back to Ali Ibn Abi Talib and his wife Fatimah the daughter of Muhammad and also I don’t have an “axe to grind” against Islam. My goal is to get to the truth even if that truth is painful.

Walima is the marriage banquet it is not the marriage ceremony. The actual ceremony called aqd usually precedes the celebration. However the hadith dose not mention any aqd taking place between Muhammad and Safiyah. In fact the Ayat Q.4: 24 and Q. 23: 1-7 allow having intercourse with captive women whom one’s “right hand possess”. So according to this Ayat Muhammad did not have to marry Safiyah for having intercourse with her. It was a right given to him by Allah.

The following Hadith shows that after the Walima or the festivity, people still did not know whether Safiyah is going to become one of Muhammad's wives or will remain just a slave that prophet's "right hand possess" 

 Sahih Muslim Book 008, Number 3328:

"...And the people ate to their fill, and they said: We do not know whether he (the Holy Prophet) had married her (as a free woman), or as a slave woman. They said: If he (the Holy Prophet) would make her wear the veil, then she would be a (free married) woman, and if he would not make her wear the veil, then she should be a slave woman. When he intended to ride, he made her wear the veil and she sat on the hind part of the camel; so they came to know that he had married her."

Muhammad had intercourse with other women without marrying them. One of them was Mariyah the Coptic maid of Hafsa. 

 


 

Khadijah

I did read your article and I found it well written and very powerful. I am going to be re-reading it and doing much consideration of it's contents..

I find that I am totally unaware and uninformed regarding some of these stories on your site...mainly about the Jewish wife of the Prophet...

regarding this and other things on your site... are these true hadiths?

(Khadijah is a white American woman who had converted to Islam and even wore Niqab. but she left Islam after learning more about it)

Answer

Dear Khadijah

The hadithes that I quoted regarding Muhammad’s lust for beautiful women in my article “Safiyah the Jewish Wife of Muhammad” are from Sahih Bukhari. They are authentic and accepted by all the Muslims specially Sunnis. That however could change. Now that I have raised questions about its immoral content, some Modernist Muslims, who are willing to do all kinds of mental gymnastics and intellectual dishonesty to save their beloved prophet from blemish, may deny their  authenticity. Some time ago I had a discussion with a pseudo-intellectual Muslim who once nailed down, claimed that not all the hadithes that are called sahih (authentic) are sahih!

However, you must realize that these hadithes were reported by devout Mulsims. These Muslims went  on their limbs to attribute a miracle to their prophet. By reporting these lies, these ruffians hoped to gain recognition and make a show of piety amongst their peers. So all those hadithes that portray Muhammad with superior powers are fabricated. Muhammad performed no miracles as he himself admitted in Quran (See my article on Miracles. However there is no reason for anyone to fabricate hadithes that report how Muhammad attacked Keibar, killed the father, husband and many of Safiyah’s relatives and wanted to mount her on the same night when she was still in shock of losing her loved ones. There is no reason for a Muslim to fabricate the fact that he (Muhammad) took possession of Safiyah, because she was the prettiest of all the women captured. But the part that says she came to Muhammad because she knew he was a prophet is, as I explained in the same story, ridiculous and false.

Dear Khadijah, I am pleased to see that after your strange odyssey in the barren land of Islam; chasing a mirage in that desert of desolation you are finally approaching the shores of reason. I was brought up in that arid land of fallacies myself and know that there is no truth there. A billion people are chasing a mirage. Their thirst is never quenched, they find nothing but death, misery, hate, intolerance, prejudice and inequality, yet they are unwilling to stop and think. They encourage each other to carry on and ask themselves: “could all these billion people be wrong?”

Now that you are coming ashore, I invite you not to abandon those lost and wayward souls to them selves. Love them and help them. Learn the truth about Islam and help them see it also. Look into my website. I have put together a library of books that shed light on the true nature of this cult. There are more materials; I will keep adding as I find them. I believe that there is nothing more worthy than awakening Muslims from their slumber. Share the story of Safiyah with other Muslim women and ask questions.

If you are concerned about violence against women and their rights: fight Islam.
If you are concerned about human rights and discrimination against minorities: fight Islam.
If you are concerned about world conflicts and the loss of millions of lives: fight Islam.
If you are concerned about animal rights for sacrificing millions of animals in a barbaric ritual of Hajj, and their cruel slaughter for producing Halal meet: fight Isalm.
If you care about science, knowledge and the advancement of human civilization: fight Islam.

 


 


 alisha_i

There are a lot of unauthentic hadiths, but for u to use that as a spring board to abusive Prophet Muhammad and Islam is mean to say the least.

Do u have anything better to do ?

Answer

Dear Alisha,

All the hadithes that I quote are taken from Sahih Bukhari. Bukhari’s hadithes are called Sahih because the early Muhadethin (knowledgeable scholars of hadith) considered them to be authentic (Sahih means correct or authentic). If you knew about “Ilmul Hadith (the science of hadith) you would not call those hadithes unauthentic. They have passed rigorous tests of authenticity to merit the title of “Sahih”.

It is not up to you or any one else to call them unauthentic because they go against your conscience. You and I cannot sit and choose what we like from the hadithes and discard what we don’t like. What criteria shall me use? Are we supposed to learn about the real Muhammad as he was or the ideal Muhammad that we have created in our imaginations. Who are we supposed to follow? A mythological superman who never existed outside our fantasies or the real Muhammad ibn Abdullah? What is our authority to become the arbitrator of the authenticity of the hadithes?

Yes there are many hadithes that are false. I explained that in my message to khadijah. Those hadithes or parts of them that portray Muhammad as a man of miracle are false. Muhammad attested in Quran that he performed no miracles except Quran, (that is of course full of errors). Also those hadithes that give some legitimacy to one sect (madhab) over the others may also be false. Shiites have a hadith that says Muhammad lifted Ali and announce whoever obeys him must also obey Ali. There is another hadith that says a similar story about AbuBakr. Hadithes like these are probably false, because someone had vested interest in fabricating them. But the stories of Muhammad attacking Kheibar, killing the residents, exiling them, capturing Safiyah and demanding to perform sex with her in the same day that he killed her father, husband and many of here relatives is history. This was a big event. People could not have just invented it. And no one would have gained anything from it. It is detrimental to Muhammad. Devout Muslims, who like you, would do anything to save their prophet from blemish would not have fabricated such thing. To what ends?
A zealot Muslim could have said: I heard the prophet say such and such. Whether he was saying the truth or not, depended on his honesty. But something like the prophet’s battles, his conquests and his wives are part of the history. Someone could not have just fabricated it. If you want to deny that, then by what proof can you be sure of the very existence of Muhammad? If you deny the historic facts of ahadith, then you are opening the door for someone to deny the historicity of Muhammad himself. I don’t think that is the rout you what to go.

A hadith is not unauthentic just because it goes against our sophisticated and humanized conscience. There are many verses of Quran too that are illogical and barbaric, are you going to say they are also false?

Instead of living in denial, we have to face the truth and accept the fact that our fathers were misled. It is up to us to mend the errors and build a new and a better society, free of prejudices, superstitions, xenophobia, intolerance, abuse and hate. We can never build peace and prosperity on falsehood.

As to your question: whether I have anything better to do; my answer is that I see nothing as worthy as awakening my fellow Muslim brothers and sisters from their slumber. I see the abuse of women in Islamic countries, the beating of them, the honor killings, and the humiliating Hijab as a direct result of Islam. I see the conflicts, the killings, terrorism and the tension in all Islamic countries as a by-product of Islam. I believe that my effort in unveiling Islam saves lives. That is why I believe what I do is really important. Unfortunately I have to work to pay my bills; otherwise I would have dedicated my life to this most sacred task.

I also invite you to investigate Islam with open mind. Cast aside the excessive love that blinds. Read Quran and hadithes and contemplate. Do not assume if it is in Quran it is right. Question what you read and if it goes against reason, know that it is not from God. God is never irrational. Doubt everything and find your own light.

Please read my article “Cocooned in Lies”. You may find more answers to your question. 

Regards

 

 

 

 

 

Articles Op-ed Authors Debates Leaving Islam FAQ
Comments Library Gallery Video Clips Books Sina's Challenge
 

  ©  copyright You may translate and publish the articles posted in this site ONLY if you provide a link to the original page and if it is not for financial gain.