Skip to Content

the New York Times

The Moral Blindness of the ‘Human Rights Industry’

Melanie Phillips

 

What brought you here?: 
When it comes to covering human rights "abuses" by Israel and those by third world nations in the press, why is there a blatant double standard?

Fear and Loathing in Detroit

Steve Emerson

 

Authorities in Detroit released an autopsy of Imam Luqman Abdullah this week and its findings show his death was not pretty. Abdullah was shot 20 times, being hit repeatedly in the legs and torso and even taking a bullet through his scrotum as FBI agents tried to arrest him October 28th for a variety of crimes.

 

What brought you here?: 
Islamists continue to use innuendo to stir hostility toward the FBI in Detroit as they, aided by the media, ignore the facts surrounding the death of a radical imam.

Time To Go Home?

In the aftermath of the recent devastating earthquake in Iran, news media reported “a miracle”: a man, extracted from the rubble and thought to be dead, stirred on the way to the mass grave. At least two other similar cases were reported. When I read it, my first thought was: In the rush to bury the victims in order to avoid an epidemic, how many people failed to stir in time and were buried alive — for the second time within hours or, at most, days? How many of those would have been alive today had Iran not rejected Israel's offer of help?


Who Feeds Fundamentalism

Stories of the atrocities and the bigotry of Muslim fundamentalists embarrass the moderate and educated Muslims who desire to live in harmony with their non-Muslim neighbors and feel nothing but compassion for the rest of the world. As we all condemn these religious extremists who blow the buildings, make bombs and engage in acts of terrorism as misguided fanatics we have to question ourselves whether we have any part in these terrorist acts of our most radical fellow coreligionists.


The Crossfire War

Crossfire War: Middle East - Central Asia: Teheran - Dushnabe - The Offensive Spectrum


Willard Payne 

2005/05/27


Why is MPAC attacking Steve Emerson? - Part 2

MPAC likewise plays fast and loose with the facts in its attempts to assail Emerson’s “professional credibility.” It cites a 1991 New York Times review of Emerson’s book Terrorist that says the book was “marred by factual errors” and political bias.

What brought you here?: 
Why are Islamic groups constantly permitted to attack those terrorism experts who speak out against Muslim terrorism? Isn't' time to start investigating these groups?

Syndicate content